What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the material drafting and responsibility handover stage in kindergarten game activity organization. The core materials include observation records, area plans, material placement lists, activity goal statements, and reflection-to-next-week plan sheets. These materials come from daily class observations and area activity arrangements, with a weekly update cadence, revised on a rolling basis as activities progress. When materials enter the form input node, the correspondence between observation records and area plans serves as the field source, the material placement quantity serves as the handover check item, the activity goal achievement status serves as the reflection basis, and the reflection-to-next-week plan serves as the sign-off content for the next stage. Field characteristics are as follows: observation records must correspond item by item with area plans, material placement quantities must match the list, goals and observation results must mutually corroborate, and plan updates must reflect reflection conclusions. Insufficient materials, mismatch between goals and observations, and unupdated plans are common inconsistencies that must be checked item by item during drafting and handover to ensure fields are complete, responsible parties are clear, and versions and dates are consistent, forming a signable material draft and handover record to be signed off by the next stage.
Configuration and implementation checks
This stage is executed by the form input node (interaction node) in the workflow, outputting the field values filled in by the user (passed to subsequent nodes after submission). The "signable material draft and handover record" is completed by subsequent nodes or manually. After the form input node is triggered, the conversation enters an interactive state and records the workflow state. After the user fills in the required items and submits, the form information is passed to subsequent nodes for use.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Observation record and area plan correspondence table | The activity area, time, and number of participants in the observation record must correspond item by item with the area plan; there must be no unupdated plan or mismatch between goals and observations | Configure the field names in the form input node, check the correspondence between observation records and area plans one by one, and confirm the fields are complete; reference the formInputResult field values for a trial run |
| Material placement list | The material placement quantity must match the list; when materials are insufficient, the handover stage must not be entered | In the node configuration, check the material name, quantity, and placement area fields one by one, and mark key material fields as required; use userSelect to select the area and then check the quantity |
| Activity goal achievement statement | Activity goals must mutually corroborate with observation results; when goals and observations do not match, it must be returned for revision | Reference the goal achievement field in subsequent nodes and run a trial, check the correspondence between goals and observation records, and confirm the version and date are consistent |
| Reflection-to-next-week plan sheet | Reflection conclusions must be transformed into specific adjustment items for the next week's plan; when the plan is not updated, it must not be issued | In the form input node, check the correspondence between reflection conclusions and next week's plan fields, and confirm the responsible party is clear and the version and date are consistent |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The material placement quantity does not match the list, and insufficient materials are only discovered at handover. Cause: During the drafting stage, the material quantity was not set as a required item, so after submission subsequent nodes cannot retrieve the corresponding field values.
- Phenomenon: Activity goals are inconsistent with observation records, and the goal achievement statement is disconnected from the area plan. Cause: Observation records and area plans were not corresponded item by item, and the mismatch between goals and observations was not intercepted.
- Phenomenon: The reflection-to-next-week plan was not updated, and the handover record still uses the old version. Cause: The plan update field was not included in the check, the version and date are inconsistent, and the responsible party is not clear.
How to verify the setup
This feature acceptance: Fill out and submit once, check the field values retrieved by subsequent nodes, confirm that submission is impossible when required items are empty, that subsequent nodes can retrieve the corresponding field values after submission, and that the conversation does not remain in the interactive state.
Business test: Draft one copy according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are intercepted.
- In the form input node configuration, check the field names and required settings one by one, and confirm that key material fields are marked as required.
- Reference the
formInputResultandselectResultfields in subsequent nodes and run a trial, confirming that the field values can be passed to subsequent nodes for use after submission.