What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the drafting of materials and handover of responsibilities in kindergarten safety protection and emergency drills. The core materials include hazard inspection and rectification records, emergency drill plans and sign-in sheets, access control and school bus checklists, and responsibility handover forms. The materials come from daily inspections of the kindergarten, drill organization, and access control and school bus post records, with an update cadence of immediate supplementary entry after each inspection, each round of drills, and each day's access control and school bus checks. The field characteristics center on hazard items and rectification deadlines, drill headcount and sign-in, access control and school bus check items, and responsible person signatures, and require version and date consistency. When these materials enter the knowledge base retrieval and recall function, each plays a different role: hazard records and drill plans serve as candidate fragment sources, handover forms and checklists serve as the basis for comparison of field completeness, and responsible person signatures and dates serve as verification anchors for version consistency. The retrieval service only returns candidate fragments and similarity scores; the signable material drafts and handover records are generated by subsequent nodes or manually based on these.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate fragments and similarity scores (after mode, merge, re-rank, filter, and limit trimming). The signable material drafts and handover records are then completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Hazard inspection and rectification records | Whether hazard items and rectification deadlines appear in pairs, and whether the responsible person signature and version date are consistent | In the knowledge base search test, test once each with synonymous questions, compare the number of candidates and scores, and check whether the hazard item, rectification deadline, responsible person signature, and version date fields are complete |
| Emergency drill plans and sign-in sheets | Whether the drill headcount and sign-in correspond, and whether the drill records match the plan process | Switch searchMode to semantic, full-text, or hybrid, see whether candidates simultaneously include plan and sign-in fragments, and check whether the headcount and sign-in fields are missing |
| Access control and school bus checklists | Whether access control and school bus check items are listed item by item, and whether missing items and unclosed items are intercepted | Turn usingReRank on or off to compare the ordering of the top few results, and check whether missing check items and unclosed hazards still appear at the front of candidates |
| Responsibility handover form | Whether the responsible person is clear, the version and date are consistent, and the handover both-party receipt fields are complete | After filtering with similarity, look at the number of candidates, then separately record the length of the reference array, and check whether the tokens of the reference text match the limit budget |
Three common errors
- Symptom: hazard records only state the problem without stating the rectification deadline, so it is impossible to judge whether it is closed at handover. Cause: during material drafting, hazard items and rectification deadlines were not entered in pairs, so the retrieval recall fragments lack the deadline field.
- Symptom: the drill sign-in headcount does not match the plan headcount, and the records do not match the plan process. Cause: the drill plan and sign-in sheet were entered separately, the version and date were not synchronized, and the candidate fragments come from different versions.
- Symptom: the access control and school bus checklist has missing items, and the responsible person signature column on the handover form is blank. Cause: the check item template did not list items one by one, and the drafting step did not intercept missing items according to the field completeness requirement.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: test once each with synonymously rewritten questions, compare candidates and scores, then toggle re-rank to see the ordering of the top few results; switch searchMode and adjust similarity, separately record the number of reference array entries, and check the tokens of the reference text and the limit budget separately.
Business test: draft one copy according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are intercepted.
- In the knowledge base search test, test the same question once each with different phrasings, record the number of candidates and scores, and confirm whether the hazard item, rectification deadline, drill headcount, sign-in, access control and school bus check items, responsible person signature, and version date fields are complete.
- Toggle
usingReRankto compare the ordering of the top few results, adjustsearchModeandsimilarity, separately record the length of the reference array and check the tokens of the reference text and thelimitbudget, and confirm that key fragments of the original text are still retained after trimming.