What this category's data looks like
This page addresses material drafting and responsibility handover in kindergarten operation behavior and quality self-assessment, involving three types of materials: self-assessment reports, issue lists, and rectification plans. Self-assessment reports are formed per semester or academic year, with fields including kindergarten conditions, safety and hygiene, care and education, faculty and staff, internal management, and other dimensions, as well as conclusions and signatures; issue lists are formed per instance, with fields including issue description, responsible position, rectification deadline, and receipt; rectification plans are formed item by item per issue, with fields including measures, completion time, and acceptance person. When materials enter this function, self-assessment reports and issue lists serve as retrieval sources for dialogue citation to generate drafts; rectification plans serve as generation targets, from which dialogue and retrieval produce signable drafts and handover records according to templates. The update rhythm is one round each at the beginning, middle, and end of the semester, with additional rounds upon inspections or rectification follow-ups. Field characteristics are multiple subjects, multiple dates, and multiple signature positions; the same record must maintain consistent names, quantities, and dates across the three materials.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, outputting model binding relationships and channel responses. Signable material drafts and handover records are subsequently completed by AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. Models are divided into five categories: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition; different steps bind different model types.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Self-assessment report | Fields must include kindergarten conditions, safety and hygiene, care and education, faculty and staff, internal management, conclusions, and signatures; dates and versions are consistent | In the model configuration, check the type labels of the language model and indexing model, compare them against the model names returned by the channel, and check whether the quoteMaxToken of the report's cited paragraphs covers the tokens of the cited text |
| Issue list | Fields must include issue description, responsible position, rectification deadline, and receipt; the same issue's name, quantity, and date are consistent across the self-assessment report and rectification plan | Check the channel configuration and key source, confirm the indexing model is bound to the retrieval step, and compare item by item the record names and dates in the list against those in the report and plan |
| Rectification plan | Fields must include measures, completion time, acceptance person, and signature; versions and dates are synchronized, with no missing signature or receipt | Run one dialogue and one retrieval, check the model identifier in the response, check whether maxContext and maxTokens satisfy the draft length, and confirm that the toolChoice configuration does not affect the completeness of draft fields |
| Handover record | Fields must include handover person, receiver, handover date, and receipt; corresponds to the material version number | Check the channel configuration and key source, confirm that the material version referenced by the handover record is consistent with the current draft version, and missing items are intercepted by the dialogue step |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The same issue's name, quantity, and date do not match between the self-assessment report and the rectification plan. Cause: The two materials were drafted separately, were not compared by the same record identifier, and an old version was retrieved during citation.
- Symptom: The issue list has been updated, but the rectification plan still references the old version, and signatures and receipts are missing. Cause: Versions were not synchronized, the handover record was not bound to the material version number, and missing items were not intercepted.
- Symptom: Retrieval reports an indexing-model-related error, or the answer style changes abruptly after switching models. Cause: The binding relationship between the indexing model and the language model is misaligned, and the model identifier is inconsistent with the name returned by the channel.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: run one dialogue and one retrieval, check the model identifier in the response, confirm that the binding relationship between the language model and the indexing model is correct, and check the values of maxContext, maxTokens, quoteMaxToken, and toolChoice in the configuration.
Business test: draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are intercepted.
- In the model configuration, check that the type labels of the five model categories correspond to the steps they are connected to, and check the model identifiers against the model names returned by the channel.
- Check the channel configuration and key source to confirm whether calls can succeed; personnel reading knowledge base materials is checked separately under business data permissions.