What this category's data looks like
This page is intended for primary and secondary school admissions organizations and covers three types of materials: admission plans, application material checklists, and admission lists. The admission plan includes the admission plan, scope, schedule, and division of responsibilities; the application material checklist includes material names, number of copies, submission methods, and deadlines; the admission list includes student names, admission results, publicity dates, and signature fields. The material sources are the academic affairs and admissions departments, and the update rhythm advances according to the admissions season. The field characteristics are names, quantities, dates, signatures, and receipts. When entering this function, the admission plan handles the overall process and responsibility division, the application material checklist handles item-by-item verification and receipt, and the admission list handles result confirmation and version traceability. During drafting and handover, the three types of materials serve as references for one another. The names, quantities, and dates of the same record must remain consistent, and versions and signatures must be synchronized.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by application settings (such as the response limit), which output the length of a single answer and the range of context that can be accommodated. "Material drafts and handover records that can be issued" are then completed by the model. The response limit uses a slider to control the length of a single answer. If set too low, the answer will be truncated; if set too high, consumption will increase.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Admission plan | Fields are complete, responsible persons are clear, and version and date are consistent | Verify the admission plan, scope, schedule, and division of responsibilities in the plan; check whether the version number and date are synchronized; confirm whether the signature field and receipt are complete; check whether maxResponse and maxContext match long-form drafting |
| Application material checklist | Material names, number of copies, dates, and signatures are complete | Verify item by item the material names, number of copies, submission methods, and deadlines; compare whether the names and quantities of the same record in the plan and checklist are consistent; check the receipt field and receipt; record the quoteMaxToken reference budget |
| Admission list | Admission results, publicity dates, and signatures are consistent | Verify the names, admission results, and publicity dates in the admission list; compare whether they correspond to the names and quantities in the application material checklist; check for unsynchronized versions and missing signatures; confirm the context range of maxResponse and maxContext |
| Handover record | Responsible persons are clear, version and date are consistent, and receipts are complete | Verify the signatures and dates of both parties in the handover; check whether the version number is consistent with the materials; confirm whether missing items are blocked; compare the three identifiers maxResponse, maxContext, and quoteMaxToken |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The names, quantities, and dates of the same record in the admission plan and application material checklist do not match. Cause: The drafting and handover stages each maintain fields separately, without cross-comparison and version synchronization.
- Phenomenon: The versions of the admission list and application material checklist are not synchronized, and signatures or receipts are missing. Cause: During handover, the version number and signature field were not verified, and the receipt did not flow with the materials.
- Phenomenon: The answer breaks off in the middle of a sentence, and the end of the material draft is incomplete. Cause: The response limit is set too low, long-form drafting is truncated, and judgment must be based on the actual end of the answer.
How to verify the setup
Function acceptance: Ask a question that requires a long answer and see whether the ending is complete; if it breaks off in the middle of a sentence, check the position of the response limit slider and whether maxResponse and maxContext match.
Business test: Draft one copy according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked; verify whether the names, quantities, dates, and signatures in the admission plan, application material checklist, and admission list are consistent.
- In the application settings, verify the response limit switch and slider position, and confirm that they match the answer length required by the page.
- Compare the usage of two runs to confirm the change in single-run usage after adjusting the limit; record the
quoteMaxTokenreference budget and the number of array entries.