What this category's data looks like
This page is intended for primary and secondary school admissions organizations. The material sources are three types of documents: admissions plans, application material checklists, and admission lists. The update cadence advances with batches during the admissions season, and the field characteristics center on names, ID numbers, application serial numbers, admission status, dates, and signature fields. When the admissions plan enters the function, it serves as the rule basis; the application material checklist serves as the attachment index; and the admission list serves as the result record. Together, the three form a signable material draft and handover record. When the materials enter the model access and configuration stage, each plays a different role: the admissions plan is used to constrain field definitions, the application material checklist is used to verify quantities and versions, and the admission list is used to confirm signatures and receipts. When the name, quantity, or date of the same record does not match across the two materials, it is necessary to return to the three criteria of complete fields, clear responsible person, and consistent version and date, compare item by item, and then hand it to the next stage for acceptance.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, outputting model binding relationships and channel responses. The signable material draft and handover record are then completed by subsequent AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. Models are divided into five categories: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition. Different stages bind different model types, and it is necessary to verify in the model configuration whether the type label, channel and key source, and model identifier are consistent with the names listed in the documentation.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Admissions plan | Complete fields: the name, date, signature field, and version number must correspond item by item with the application material checklist | Check the field names and dates in the plan against the template, check whether the signature field is left blank, and confirm that the version number is consistent with the current batch |
| Application material checklist | Consistent quantity and date: the name, quantity, and date of the same record in the two materials must match | Extract the application serial numbers in the checklist and compare them with the admission list, verify the tokens of the quoted text, record the number of array items separately, and treat quoteMaxToken only as the quoted content budget |
| Admission list | Clear responsible person: signatures and receipts must be complete, and version and date must be synchronized | Check the signature field and receipt field in the list, confirm the responsible person's name and date, and verify the binding relationships of maxContext, maxTokens, and toolChoice in the model configuration |
| Model binding relationships | The model type corresponds to the stage in which it is to be used, and the model identifier is consistent with the names listed in the documentation | Verify the type labels in the model configuration, compare them with the model names returned by the channel, and confirm that language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition are each in their proper place |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the name, quantity, or date of the same record does not match across the two materials. Cause: the admissions plan and the application material checklist were not updated in sync, and the field definitions were not unified.
- Symptom: the version is not synchronized, and the dates of the admission list and the handover record are inconsistent. Cause: the version number was not written back after the materials were drafted, and the date field was not checked during the handover stage.
- Symptom: signatures or receipts are missing, and the materials cannot be issued. Cause: the responsible person did not sign in the signature field, and the receipt was not archived together with the handover record.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: run one conversation and one retrieval, check the model identifiers in the responses, confirm that the language model and the indexing model are each bound correctly, and check the values of maxContext, maxTokens, quoteMaxToken, and toolChoice in the channel responses.
Business test: draft one set according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- Verify the model type labels and channel key sources in the model configuration, and confirm that the model identifiers are consistent with the names listed in the documentation.
- Draft the admissions plan, application material checklist, and admission list according to the template, verify the fields, dates, and signatures item by item, and then hand them to the next stage for acceptance.