What this category's data looks like
This page is for primary and secondary school admissions organizations, focusing on the drafting and responsibility handover of three types of materials: admissions plans, application material checklists, and admission lists. The materials come from the requirements of education authorities, school admissions work arrangements, and records of the application and admission process. The update rhythm adjusts as the admissions season progresses: the plan comes first, the checklist is supplemented as applications proceed, and the list is finalized after admission. When the three types of materials enter the forms and interaction function, each has a different role: the admissions plan carries the process and time nodes, the application material checklist carries material names and quantities, and the admission list carries student information and admission results. Field characteristics are concentrated in names, quantities, dates, signatures, and versions, and the same record must remain consistent across the three types of materials.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the form input node (interaction node) in the workflow, which outputs the field values filled in by the user (passed to subsequent nodes after submission). The material drafts and handover records that can be issued are completed by subsequent nodes or manually afterward. After the form input node is triggered, the conversation enters an interactive state and records the workflow state. After the user fills in the required items and submits, the form information is passed to subsequent nodes for use.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Admissions plan | Fields are complete, responsible person is clear, version and date are consistent | Check field names and required settings one by one in the node configuration, and confirm that the plan name, time nodes, responsible person, and version date are complete |
| Application material checklist | Material names, quantities, dates, and signatures can be checked | Check whether the checklist fields match the names, quantities, and dates in the admissions plan, and inspect the signature or receipt positions |
| Admission list | The names, quantities, and dates of the same record are consistent in both materials | Check whether the student names, quantities, and dates in the list and the checklist are consistent, and check whether the versions are synchronized |
| formInputResult and selectResult | Subsequent nodes can retrieve the corresponding field values | Reference the field in a subsequent node and run a test to confirm that the field values of formInputResult and selectResult are passed correctly |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The names, quantities, and dates of the same record do not match between the admissions plan and the application material checklist. Cause: Fields were not checked against a unified template, and each was filled in separately during drafting.
- Phenomenon: The versions of the admission list and the checklist are not synchronized, and an old version is still in use. Cause: The version and date were not updated with the handover record, and synchronization verification was lacking.
- Phenomenon: Materials lack signatures or receipts, and the handover record is incomplete. Cause: Signature and receipt fields were not marked as required, so they were not blocked at submission.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: fill it out once and submit, check the field values retrieved by subsequent nodes, and confirm that formInputResult and selectResult are passed correctly.
Business test: draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- Check field names and required settings one by one in the node configuration, and confirm that key material fields are marked as required.
- Reference the field in a subsequent node and run a test to confirm that after submission the field values can be passed to subsequent nodes for use.