What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the scenario of primary and secondary school timetables and after-school service scheduling. The material sources are the master timetable exported from the academic scheduling system, the teacher assignment table, the after-school service project table, and the handover records issued at each stage. The update cadence rolls with the start-of-semester scheduling, weekly schedule adjustments, and changes to after-school service projects. The field characteristics center on course name, assigned teacher, class, weekly class hours, service project name, start date, version number, and signature field. When the materials enter the model access and configuration function, the master timetable, teacher assignment table, and after-school service project table serve as the business content to be drafted and handed over, and are read by the dialogue and retrieval stages to generate signable material drafts and handover records; the model channel configuration is only responsible for binding the five types of models—language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition—to the corresponding stages, and does not change the responsibility attribution or field completeness of the materials themselves.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, which outputs the model binding relationships and channel responses. The signable material drafts and handover records are then completed by subsequent AI nodes, code nodes, or humans. Different stages bind different model types, and the binding relationships that material drafting and retrieval depend on must be consistent with the model identifiers returned by the channel.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Master timetable | Fields complete, responsible person clear, version and date consistent, and the course name, class, and weekly class hours match those in the teacher assignment table | Check the course name, class, weekly class hours, version number, and signature field of the master timetable against the teacher assignment table; in the model configuration, check the type labels of the language model and indexing model and the model identifiers returned by the channel |
| Teacher assignment table | Fields complete, responsible person clear, version and date consistent, and the teacher, course, and date match those in the master timetable | Check the teacher name, course name, date, version number, and signature field of the teacher assignment table against the master timetable; check the channel configuration and key source to confirm whether the call can succeed |
| After-school service project table | Fields complete, responsible person clear, version and date consistent, and the project name, quantity, and date match those in the handover records | Check the project name, quantity, date, version number, and receipt of the after-school service project table against the handover records; check whether the values of quoteMaxToken and maxContext match the quoted text budget and context length |
| Model binding relationships and channel responses | The model type corresponds to the stage in which it is to be used, and the model identifier is consistent with the name listed in the documentation | In the model configuration, check the type labels; compare against the model name returned by the channel; according to maxTokens and toolChoice, check whether the call parameters and tool selection are consistent with the current stage |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name and weekly class hours of the same course do not match between the master timetable and the teacher assignment table. Cause: The two materials were drafted separately and were not checked in sync against the same version number and date.
- Symptom: The after-school service project table has been updated, but the handover records still reference the old version. Cause: The version was not synchronized, and the version number and date were not checked during handover.
- Symptom: The material draft lacks a signature or receipt, and the next stage cannot sign for acceptance. Cause: The responsible person was not clarified, and the handover records were not filled in with the signature field and receipt field as required by the template.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: run one dialogue and one retrieval, check the model identifiers in the responses, confirm that the binding relationships of the language model and indexing model are consistent with the model names returned by the channel, and check that the values of maxContext, maxTokens, quoteMaxToken, and toolChoice match the current stage; the number of quotes is recorded separately by array length, and the quoted content budget is checked against the tokens of the quoted text according to quoteMaxToken; the two are not compared for equality.
Business test: draft one copy according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- In the model configuration, check the correspondence between the type labels of the five types of models and the stages to which they are connected, and compare against the model names returned by the channel to confirm that the model identifiers are consistent.
- Check the channel configuration and key source to confirm whether the call can succeed; at the same time, check whether the name, quantity, date, version number, signature, and receipt of the master timetable, teacher assignment table, after-school service project table, and handover records are complete and consistent.