What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the graduate admissions re-examination and admission scenario, handling the drafting and handover of responsibilities for three types of materials: re-examination plans, candidate score sheets, and transfer lists. The materials originate from aggregation across internal stages of the admissions unit, and their update cadence changes with re-examination batches and transfer rounds. Field characteristics include candidate number, name, preliminary and re-examination scores, major direction, date, signature, and receipt. When materials enter the model integration and configuration function, the re-examination plan serves as the rule draft, the candidate score sheet serves as the data basis, and the transfer list serves as the list source, each assuming different roles for use by the dialogue and retrieval stages to generate signable drafts and handover records.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, outputting model binding relationships and channel responses. "Signable material drafts and handover records" are subsequently completed by AI nodes, code nodes, or humans. Models are divided into five categories: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition, and different stages bind different model types.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Re-examination plan | Fields, dates, and signatures are complete; version is consistent with the candidate score sheet and transfer list | Check the major name, quota quantity, dates, and signature fields in the plan against the template, verify whether they match the score sheet and transfer list, and check whether maxContext and maxTokens satisfy long-text drafting |
| Candidate score sheet | Candidate number, name, and score fields match the transfer list item by item; dates and version are synchronized | Compare the names, quantities, and dates in the two materials item by item, and intercept upon finding any inconsistency; check quoteMaxToken and the tokens of the quoted text, and record the array count separately |
| Transfer list | List fields are complete, responsible persons are clear, and signatures and receipts are not missing | Check that the candidate numbers and major directions in the list match the score sheet, inspect the signatures and receipts in the handover records, and confirm that the version and dates are synchronized |
| Model binding relationships | Model types correspond to the stages in which they are to be used, and model identifiers match the names listed in the documentation | Check the type annotations in the model configuration, compare them with the model names returned by the channel, and check whether toolChoice and maxContext are suitable for the current stage |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, or date of the same candidate does not match between two materials. Cause: During drafting, the re-examination plan, score sheet, and transfer list were not compared item by item, and field sources were not synchronized.
- Symptom: Material versions are not synchronized, and an old plan is mixed with a new list. Cause: During handover, the version and date were not checked, and items were not checked one by one against the template.
- Symptom: Signatures or receipts are missing, and materials cannot be issued. Cause: The handover records did not assign responsible persons, and the receipt stage did not block missing items.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: run one dialogue and one retrieval, check the model identifiers in the responses, confirm that the language model and indexing model correspond to the correct stages respectively, and check the values of maxContext, maxTokens, and quoteMaxToken in the configuration.
Business test: draft one copy according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- In the model configuration, check the model type annotations and the model names returned by the channel, and confirm that language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition are each bound to the corresponding stage.
- Check the fields, dates, and signatures of the re-examination plan, candidate score sheet, and transfer list item by item according to the template, and intercept upon finding inconsistent names, quantities, dates, or unsynchronized versions.