What this category's data looks like
Degree conferral and certificate information reporting involves three types of materials: degree application forms, thesis review forms, and defense resolutions. The degree application form records the applicant's identity, discipline, and degree type, with fields including name, student ID, major, date, and signature; the thesis review form carries the review conclusion, reviewer information, and review date; the defense resolution records the defense committee's opinion, voting result, and chair's signature. The three types of materials enter the material drafting and responsibility handover stage in batches, each with a different role: the degree application form provides basic identity and application information, the thesis review form provides the basis for the review conclusion, and the defense resolution provides the final resolution and signature credentials. The material source is item-by-item filling and review at each training stage, and the update rhythm advances in sync with the batches. The field characteristics are reflected in that the name, quantity, and date of the same record must remain consistent across the three types of materials, versions and dates must be synchronized, and signatures and receipts must be complete.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, outputting model binding relationships and channel responses. The signable material drafts and handover records are then completed by subsequent AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. Models are divided into five categories: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition, and different stages bind different model types.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Degree application form | Fields complete, date and signature consistent | Check the name, student ID, major, date, and signature fields, and compare whether the name, quantity, and date of the same record in the thesis review form and defense resolution are consistent; check whether the version and date are synchronized |
| Thesis review form | Review conclusion, reviewer information, and review date complete | Check the reviewer, review conclusion, review date, and signature receipt; cross-compare the name, quantity, and date of the same record with the degree application form and defense resolution |
| Defense resolution | Defense committee opinion, voting result, and chair's signature complete | Check the defense committee members, voting result, defense date, and chair's signature; check whether the version and date are synchronized with the degree application form and thesis review form, and whether the receipt is complete |
| Model binding relationship | Model type corresponds to the stage to be used | In the model configuration, check the type label, compare it with the model name returned by the channel, and check whether the model identifier is consistent with the name listed in the documentation; verify the configuration items maxContext, maxTokens, and quoteMaxToken, and separately record the number of entries in the citation array |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the degree application form and the defense resolution. Cause: During material drafting, verification was not performed against unified fields, and during responsibility handover, item-by-item comparison was not performed.
- Symptom: The versions of the thesis review form and defense resolution are not synchronized, and the dates are inconsistent. Cause: After the materials were updated, the version number and date were not synchronized, and the handover record did not note the changes.
- Symptom: The defense resolution lacks the chair's signature or receipt, and the materials cannot be issued. Cause: During the responsibility handover stage, the completeness of signatures and receipts was not checked, and missing items were not blocked.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: run one conversation and one retrieval, and check the model identifier in the response; verify the configuration items maxContext, maxTokens, quoteMaxToken, and toolChoice, and separately record the number of entries in the citation array.
Business test: draft one copy according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- In the model configuration, check that the model type label corresponds to the stage to be used, and compare it with the model name returned by the channel to check whether the model identifier is consistent with the name listed in the documentation.
- Draft the degree application form, thesis review form, and defense resolution according to the template, check the fields, dates, and signatures item by item, complete one handover, and record the receipt.