What this category's data looks like
The data sources for university employment signing and graduation destination statistics are employment agreements, graduation destination registration forms, and employer certificates, updated by graduation batch and signing milestone. The employment agreement carries the employer name, unified social credit code, position, signing date, and signatures of both parties; the graduation destination registration form carries the destination category, employer location, registration certificate information, and personal confirmation; the employer certificate carries the hiring fact, receiving department, contact person, and receipt. When these three materials enter model access and configuration, their roles differ: the agreement and the registration form serve as text chunks to be read by dialogue and retrieval, with the index model establishing the retrieval entry point; the receipt and signature page of the employer certificate serve as attachments to be verified, with the rerank model optimizing retrieval ranking before they are cited in dialogue. The field characteristic is that multiple materials cross-reference the same record; names, quantities, dates, and signatures must be aligned item by item, versions and dates must be consistent, and missing items and missing receipts must be blocked at the drafting stage.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, which outputs the model binding relationships and channel responses. The material drafts and handover records that can be issued are completed subsequently by AI nodes, code nodes, or humans. Models are divided into five categories: language, index, rerank, speech synthesis, and speech recognition. Different steps bind different model types; the binding relationships and channel responses only determine whether the call can succeed.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Employment agreement | The employer name, unified social credit code, position, signing date, and signatures of both parties must be consistent with the registration form | In the model configuration, check the type annotation, compare it with the model name returned by the channel, and check the language model binding; check the channel configuration and key source |
| Graduation destination registration form | The destination category, employer location, registration certificate information, and personal confirmation must be aligned with the agreement, and the version and date must be consistent | Check the index model binding and confirm that the text chunks can be retrieved; check the channel configuration and key source |
| Employer certificate | The hiring fact, receiving department, contact person, and receipt must be complete, and the signature and receipt must not be missing | Check the rerank model binding and confirm that retrieval ranking optimization takes effect; compare it with the model name returned by the channel |
| Model configuration item | The model identifier is consistent with the name listed in the documentation, and the type annotation corresponds to the step in which it is to be used | Check the value boundaries of maxContext, maxTokens, and quoteMaxToken; when a citation limit is involved, check the tokens of the cited text, and record the number of array entries separately |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The employer name, position quantity, or signing date of the same record does not match between the agreement and the registration form. Cause: The two materials were drafted separately and were not cross-checked against the same record.
- Symptom: The registration form has been updated to a new version, but the agreement is still the old version, and the date and signature have not been synchronized. Cause: The version was not synchronized, and the version and date were not checked during handover.
- Symptom: The employer certificate is missing a signature or receipt, but the draft still proceeds to the next step. Cause: The missing item was not blocked, and the responsible person was not specified.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: run one dialogue and one retrieval, and check the model identifier in the response; confirm that the binding relationships of the language model and index model are consistent with the channel response. If retrieval reports an index model-related error or authentication failure, it does not pass.
Business test: draft one copy according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- In the model configuration, check the type annotation, compare it with the model name returned by the channel, and confirm that the model identifier is consistent with the name listed in the documentation.
- Check the channel configuration and key source, and confirm that they are consistent with the connected service; the channel key only affects whether the call can succeed, and does not determine whether personnel can read knowledge base materials.