What this category's data looks like
Vocational college program setup filing materials cover three categories: the program setup filing form, talent demand justification, and faculty and equipment list. The filing form fields include program name, code, program length, enrollment scale, signature, and date; the talent demand justification includes industry positions, demand quantity, survey date, and justification opinion; the faculty and equipment list includes teacher name, title, equipment name, quantity, and purchase date. The source is submissions by academic affairs and departments, and updates advance with application batches and review nodes. When the materials enter multi-turn dialogue and prompt configuration, the filing form serves as the main record, while the talent demand justification and faculty and equipment list serve as supporting records, and the fields of the three must be cross-consistent.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the memory turn count and prompt configuration in the application settings, and outputs the historical message range and answer constraints to reference. The "issuable material draft and handover record" is then completed by the model. The memory turn count controls how many previous dialogue turns can be referenced at most when answering, and its value must match the range of prior context required by the question.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Program setup filing form | Program name, code, program length, enrollment scale, signature, and date are complete | Check the memory turn count value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, and check whether the first turn in messages is treated as prior context |
| Talent demand justification | Industry positions, demand quantity, survey date, and justification opinion are consistent with the filing form | Compare the name, quantity, and date of the same record in the two materials, and record differences in variables values |
| Faculty and equipment list | Teacher name, title, equipment name, quantity, and purchase date are consistent with the filing form | Check the version and date, check whether signatures and receipts are complete, and confirm that chatId corresponds to the same dialogue record |
| Handover record | The responsible person is clear, the version and date are consistent, and the next step has been signed for | Draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name, quantity, or date of the same record does not match between the filing form and the faculty and equipment list. Cause: The two materials are filled in separately, without cross-checking and version synchronization.
- Phenomenon: The survey date of the talent demand justification is inconsistent with the date in the filing form, and the version is not synchronized. Cause: The update rhythms differ, and the old version is still referenced in the dialogue context.
- Phenomenon: The handover record lacks a signature or receipt, and the next step cannot sign for it. Cause: The responsible person is not clear, and the fields are not complete before entering handover.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: ask two consecutive follow-up questions and see whether the second question inherits the reference from the first question; if the second answer is off-topic, check the memory turn count value and the messages range.
Business test: draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- Check the current memory turn count value in the application settings, compare the usage records of two runs, and confirm that consumption changes accordingly after the turn count is adjusted.
- Run a trial with two consecutive questions, check the inheritance relationship of
chatId,messages, andvariablesin the dialogue, and confirm that the opening message is not treated as prior context.