Multi-Turn Conversation and Prompts for Vocational College Curriculum Planning: Draft Materials and Hand Over Responsibilities

Vocational Curricula: review conversation for material handover. Check source versions, input mappings and the values received by downstream nodes.

What this category's data looks like

The development of talent cultivation programs in vocational colleges involves three types of materials: talent cultivation programs, course standards, and job competency analysis tables. Talent cultivation programs come from academic affairs and professional teaching and research offices, revised by academic year, with fields including program name, program length, cultivation objectives, course modules, credit hours and credits, signature fields, and version date; course standards come from course teams, iterated by course, with fields including course name, objectives, content, credit hours, assessment methods, signature, and version; job competency analysis tables come from industry research, updated by job, with fields including job name, competency items, corresponding courses, research date, and signature. When these three types of materials enter multi-turn dialogue and prompt features, they serve respectively as the text to be drafted, the basis for field verification, and the reference for job correspondence, based on which the model generates signable drafts and handover records.

Configuration and implementation checks

This step is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, which output the historical message range and answer constraints for reference. "Signable material drafts and handover records" are then completed by the model. Memory turns control how many previous dialogue turns can be referenced at most when answering; if the value is too small, the preceding text cannot be used, and if the value is too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.

ObjectCheckVerification action
Talent cultivation programFields include program name, program length, cultivation objectives, course modules, credit hours and credits, signature and version date, and are aligned item by item with course standards and job competency analysis tablesCheck the memory turns value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, and check whether the second round can carry forward the references from the first round
Course standardCourse name, credit hours, and assessment methods are consistent with the course modules in the talent cultivation program, and the version date is synchronizedCompare the usage records of two runs to confirm the consumption change after adjusting the turns, and check the historical range in messages
Job competency analysis tableJob name, competency items, and corresponding courses match the record names, quantities, and dates in the talent cultivation program and course standardsUse chatId to locate the same session, check whether the fields in variables are complete, and intercept when signatures or receipts are missing
Handover recordResponsible person, version, date, and signature receipt are complete and synchronized with the versions of the three materialsDraft one according to the template and complete one handover, and check whether missing items are blocked

Three common errors

  • Phenomenon: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the talent cultivation program and the course standard. Cause: During drafting, verification was not performed according to unified fields, and versions were not synchronized.
  • Phenomenon: After the job competency analysis table is updated, the corresponding courses and credit hours are not modified in sync. Cause: The handover step lacks a receipt, and the responsible person and version date are not registered.
  • Phenomenon: When references are used in the second question, the answer does not address the question, or the opening message is treated as preceding text. Cause: The memory turns value does not match the range of preceding text required by the question.

How to verify the setup

Acceptance of this feature: Use two consecutive follow-up questions to see whether the second question carries forward the references from the first question, and check the performance of the three identifiers messages, chatId, and variables in the run records.

Business test: Draft one according to the template and complete one handover to see whether missing items are blocked.

  • Check the current memory turns value in the application settings and match it with the range of preceding text required by the question.
  • Compare the usage records of two runs to confirm the consumption change after adjusting the turns, and check whether the responsible person, version, and date in the handover record are consistent.