What this category's data looks like
Developing a talent cultivation program in a vocational college involves three types of materials: the talent cultivation program, course standards, and job competency analysis tables. The talent cultivation program is drafted by the academic affairs office or the program leader, course standards are written by course leaders, and job competency analysis tables are jointly filled in by professional teachers and enterprise personnel. Material sources include industry research, enterprise job tasks, and on-campus teaching standards, and the update rhythm typically follows rolling revisions by academic year or program adjustment cycle. Field characteristics center on program name, course name, class hours and credits, job name, competency items, dates, and signature fields. When entering workflow orchestration, the talent cultivation program serves as the main document driving the overall branches, while course standards and job competency analysis tables follow the flow as attachments or supporting documents. The three must maintain consistent names, quantities, and dates for the same record, synchronized versions, and complete signatures or receipts before they can enter the next step of sign-off.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by workflow nodes (user selection and branching), outputting branch directions and interaction status records. "Signable material drafts and handover records" are completed by subsequent nodes continuing execution according to the branches. When the user selection node is triggered, the conversation enters an interactive state and records the workflow status; after the user completes the selection, execution continues along the branch corresponding to the selected option.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| User selection node | Each option corresponds to one branch, and options and branch connections correspond one by one | Check options and branch connections one by one in the node, and after a trial run, view the branch directions in the run records |
| Interaction status | The status is recorded when entering the node, and the process continues after the interaction is completed | Trigger it once, view the node status in the run records, and confirm it is not stuck |
| Selection result variable | It has been passed to subsequent nodes and can be referenced in subsequent nodes | Reference variables in a subsequent node and run a trial once, and check the output corresponding to nodeId |
| Talent cultivation program and course standards | The names, quantities, and dates of the same record do not match across the two materials | Compare program name, course name, class hours and credits, and dates field by field; block if signatures or receipts are missing |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The names, quantities, and dates of the same record do not match across the two materials. Cause: During drafting, the fields of course standards and job competency analysis tables were not synchronized based on the talent cultivation program.
- Phenomenon: Versions are not synchronized, and the old version of course standards still flows with the new program. Cause: After revision, the version number and date were not updated, and the handover records did not indicate the corresponding version.
- Phenomenon: Signatures or receipts are missing, and the material draft cannot be issued. Cause: The handover step did not set up signature fields and receipt confirmation, and the responsible persons are unclear.
How to verify the setup
This feature acceptance: Run trials option by option, check the branch directions and interaction status in the run records, and confirm that the correspondence between variables and nodeId is correct.
Business test: Draft one copy according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- In the user selection node, check options and branch connections one by one, and after a trial run, view the branch directions and interaction status in the run records.
- Reference
variablesin a subsequent node and run a trial once, and check the output corresponding tonodeIdand the handover record fields.