What this category's data looks like
Vocational school student internship management involves three types of materials: internship agreements, internship plans, and internship logs. The agreement is signed by three parties: the school, the enterprise, and the student, with fields including position, term, insurance, and signatures; the plan is drafted by the professional teaching and research group, including rotation arrangements, mentors, and assessment methods; the log is filled in daily by the student, including date, tasks, and mentor confirmation. These three types of materials enter the dialogue function during drafting and handover: the agreement and plan serve as drafts pending issuance, and the log serves as a process receipt. The material update rhythm is: agreements by batch, plans by semester, and logs by day. The field characteristics are multi-party signatures and date chains. The name, quantity, and date of the same record must be aligned between two materials, and versions and receipts must be synchronized.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, and the output references the historical message range and answer constraints. Signable material drafts and handover records are then completed by the model. Memory turns control how many previous dialogue turns can be referenced at most when answering. If the value is too small, prior context cannot be used; if too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Internship agreement | Fields are complete, responsible persons are clear, and version and date are consistent | Check the memory turns value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, check whether the second round can carry forward the references from the first round, and verify the correspondence between messages and chatId |
| Internship plan | Rotation arrangements, mentors, and assessment methods match the names, quantities, and dates in the agreement | Draft a plan according to the template, complete one handover and receipt, see whether missing items and unsynchronized versions are blocked, and record the filling results of variables |
| Internship log | Date, tasks, mentor confirmation, and receipt are complete, and no signature is missing | Use two consecutive follow-up questions to verify whether the same record's name, quantity, and date in the log, agreement, and plan are consistent, and compare the usage records of two runs |
| Handover record | Responsible persons are clear, version and date are consistent, and the receipt is complete | Complete one handover according to the template, check whether missing signatures or receipts are blocked, and verify the historical message range under chatId |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the agreement and the plan. Cause: During drafting, fields were not checked one by one according to the template, and there was no consistency check before handover.
- Phenomenon: The version is not synchronized, and old drafts and new drafts are mixed. Cause: After the material was updated, the version number and date were not refreshed, and the handover record was not bound to the current version.
- Phenomenon: Signatures or receipts are missing, and the material cannot be issued. Cause: The responsible person field is empty, the handover step does not require receipt confirmation, and the receipt is not archived.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: Ask two consecutive follow-up questions, see whether the second question carries forward the references from the first question, and verify whether the memory turns value matches the historical message range.
Business test: Draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- Check the current memory turns value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, and confirm that the second round can correctly carry forward the references from the first round.
- Compare the usage records of two runs, confirm that consumption changes accordingly after adjusting the turns, and verify the filling results of
variablesin the material fields.