What this category's data looks like
In vocational school student internship management, three types of materials are mainly accumulated on the materials side: internship agreements, internship plans, and internship logs. Agreements come from finalized negotiations between the school and partner organizations, plans are prepared by professional teaching and research groups according to training programs, and logs are filled in daily by students and regularly reviewed by supervising teachers. The three types of materials have different update rhythms: agreements are revised with changes in cooperation or policy adjustments, plans are published by semester or batch, and logs accumulate daily. Field characteristics center on student and organization names, position and location, start and end dates, daily content, signatures, and receipts. When entering the model integration and configuration stage, agreements and plans are indexed as retrieval sources, logs are referenced as dialogue context, and the model is only responsible for generating signable drafts and handover records, without changing the responsibility attribution of the materials themselves.
Configuration and implementation checks
The server-side model channel configuration only outputs model binding relationships and channel responses; signable material drafts and handover records must be produced by the dialogue and retrieval components. Models are divided into five categories: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition, and different stages bind different model types.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Internship agreement | Fields and signatures: whether student and organization names, position, start and end dates, signatures of both parties, and receipts are complete | Check names, quantities, dates, and signatures item by item against the template, and verify whether the version and date are consistent |
| Internship plan | Fields and dates: whether the batch, position arrangements, supervising teacher, and start and end dates are consistent with the agreement | Verify whether the names, quantities, and dates in the plan and agreement match, and whether missing items are blocked |
| Internship log | Fields and receipts: whether daily content, dates, student signatures, and teacher review receipts are complete | Verify whether log dates and plan dates are continuous, and whether missing signatures or receipts are blocked |
| Model binding | The model type corresponds to the stage to be used, and the model identifier matches the name listed in the documentation | Check the type annotation in the model configuration, compare it with the model name returned by the channel, and check maxContext, maxTokens, quoteMaxToken |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name or number of positions for the same student does not match between the agreement and the plan. Cause: The two materials were drafted separately, without field-level comparison and version synchronization.
- Symptom: Internship log dates are not continuous with the plan's start and end dates, and this is discovered only at handover. Cause: Logs are filled in daily, and the date range was not written back after the plan was revised.
- Symptom: Materials lack signatures or receipts, and the next stage cannot sign off. Cause: Drafting and handover records were not bound to responsible persons, and versions and dates were not synchronized.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this feature: run one dialogue and one retrieval, check the model identifier in the response, and check whether maxContext, maxTokens, quoteMaxToken, and toolChoice are consistent with the bound stage.
Business test: draft one document according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- Check the channel configuration and key source, and confirm that the channel is consistent with the connected service
- Compare with the model name returned by the channel, and check that the model identifier matches the name listed in the documentation