What this category's data looks like
This category involves three types of materials: school-enterprise cooperation agreements, order class training plans, and master-apprentice records. School-enterprise cooperation agreements come from finalized negotiations between both parties, updated by academic year or project cycle, with fields including cooperation entities, training positions, duration, and signature fields; order class training plans come from academic affairs and departments, revised on a rolling semester basis, with fields including course modules, credit hour allocation, assessment methods, and approval dates; master-apprentice records come from mentoring masters, submitted weekly or monthly, with fields including apprentice name, process name, mentoring duration, master signature, and receipt. When materials enter the model access and configuration stage, they each assume different roles: agreements and plans serve as sources of signable material drafts, apprentice records serve as sources of handover records, and all three need to invoke bound models in dialogue and retrieval to complete drafting and verification. Only after fields are complete, responsible parties are clear, and versions and dates are consistent can they be handed over to the next stage for acceptance.
Configuration and implementation checks
This stage is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, outputting model binding relationships and channel responses. "Signable material drafts and handover records" are subsequently completed by AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. Models are divided into five categories: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition. Different stages bind different model types, and during configuration it is necessary to verify type annotations and the model names returned by channels.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| School-enterprise cooperation agreement | Whether cooperation entities, training positions, duration, signature fields, and version dates are complete, and whether the same record name and date are consistent across the two materials | Verify the model identifier against the model name returned by the channel, check whether maxContext and maxTokens cover the length of the agreement text, and confirm that signature fields and receipts are not missing |
| Order class training plan | Whether course modules, credit hour allocation, assessment methods, approval dates, and versions are synchronized, and whether quantities and dates are consistent with the agreement | Verify the binding relationship between the indexing model and the reranking model, check whether quoteMaxToken meets the plan's citation budget, and confirm that approval dates and version numbers are not misaligned |
| Master-apprentice record | Whether apprentice name, process name, mentoring duration, master signature, and receipt are complete, and whether the same record name and quantity match | Verify the language model binding relationship, check the value of toolChoice in the drafting stage, and confirm that the master signature and receipt have been returned |
| Model channel configuration | Whether the channel and key are consistent with the accessed service, and whether the model type corresponds to the stage to be used | Verify the channel configuration and key source, confirm the model identifier against the model name returned by the channel, and check the type annotations of the five model categories |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The same apprentice name and mentoring duration do not match between the agreement and the apprentice record. Cause: The two material versions were not synchronized, and fields were not verified against the same template during drafting.
- Symptom: The approval date of the order class training plan is inconsistent with the agreement duration. Cause: The agreement was not written back after the plan was revised, and date fields were maintained independently.
- Symptom: The master-apprentice record is missing a signature or receipt. Cause: The handover stage did not check item by item according to the template, and signature fields and receipt fields were skipped.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: Run one dialogue and one retrieval, verify the model identifier in the response, confirm the binding relationship against the model name returned by the channel, and check whether the values of maxContext, maxTokens, quoteMaxToken, and toolChoice match the stage.
Business test: Draft one document according to the template and complete one handover to see whether missing items are blocked.
- In the model configuration, verify the type annotations and confirm that the five model categories—language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition—correspond to the stages to be used.
- Verify the channel configuration and key source, confirm the model identifier against the model name returned by the channel, and check whether signature fields and receipt fields are complete.