What this category's data looks like
This page focuses on material drafting and responsibility handover in academic education management of technical colleges. The sources are student registration forms, teaching plans, skills training records, and handover receipts, and the update cadence keeps pace with semester registration, teaching adjustments, and training progress. When entering the knowledge base retrieval service, these materials participate in recall as candidate chunks: student registration forms provide student identity and registration status fields, teaching plans provide course names, class hours, and execution dates, and skills training records provide training items, quantities, and signature fields. The retrieval service does not generate issuable materials; it only outputs candidate chunks and similarity scores for subsequent nodes or humans to draft and hand over accordingly. Field characteristics center on names, quantities, dates, versions, signatures, and receipts, and the absence of any one of them prevents the material from entering the receipt confirmation stage.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is performed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), which outputs candidate chunks and similarity scores (after pattern, merge, re-rank, filter, and limit trimming). Issuable material drafts and handover records are then completed by subsequent nodes or humans.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Student registration form | Fields include name, student ID, registration date, and signature; the name, quantity, and date of the same record in two materials must be consistent | In the search test, switch searchMode to semantic, full-text, or hybrid, and verify whether the candidate chunks cover the registration fields and signature field |
| Teaching plan | Course name, class hours, execution date, and version number are complete; when the version is not synchronized, the dates in the two materials do not match | Compare the order of the top few candidates before and after enabling re-rank, and verify the impact of usingReRank on the relevance of teaching plan chunks |
| Skills training record | Training item, quantity, training date, and responsible person's signature are complete; if the signature or receipt is missing, it must not enter handover | After filtering by the similarity threshold, record the number of candidates and scores, and verify whether key training chunks are retained |
| Handover record | The handing-over parties, handover date, receipt signature, and version are consistent; block when the quantity of the same record in two materials does not match | Verify whether the candidate chunks contain the handing-over parties and receipt fields, and separately record the number of citations and cited text tokens |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: the name, quantity, and date of the same record in two materials do not match. Cause: drafting did not use the same candidate chunk as the baseline, and fields were not checked one by one before handover.
- Phenomenon: versions are not synchronized, and an old teaching plan and a new training record enter handover at the same time. Cause: retrieval candidates were not filtered by version, and the version number and date were not manually checked.
- Phenomenon: the signature or receipt is missing, and the material cannot enter the receipt confirmation stage. Cause: the candidate chunks did not cover the signature field, and the handover record did not include the receipt field.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: test once each with synonym-rewritten questions, compare candidates and scores, then toggle re-rank on and off to observe the ordering of the top few results; switch searchMode and record the number of candidates and scores, and check the impact of usingReRank and similarity on ordering and filtering.
Business test: draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- In the knowledge base search test, fix one question, switch
searchModeto semantic, full-text, and hybrid, record the number of candidates and scores respectively, and verify whether material fields are recalled. - Enable and disable re-rank, compare the order of the top few candidates; after filtering by
similarity, separately record the number of citations and cited text tokens, and verify whether key signature and receipt fields are retained.