What this category's data looks like
Materials for vocational college skills competition organization consist mainly of competition regulations, registration forms, and training plans. Their sources are the school's academic affairs office and the event preparation team, and the update cadence is revised round by round as the competition schedule advances. Competition regulations include the event name, group, time and location, scoring criteria, and signature fields; registration forms include contestant name, student ID, major, supervising instructor, contact information, and seal; training plans include phase objectives, week numbers, venue, equipment, and responsible person. The three types of materials play different roles when they enter the workflow: regulations serve as the basis for judgment, registration forms serve as the source of personnel and quantities, and training plans serve as the source of progress and responsibility. After the materials enter the feature, workflow nodes first present options, the user makes selections according to material category and handover direction, the system records the interaction state, and then routes the materials to the next stage according to the branch. Field characteristics are concentrated in names, quantities, dates, version numbers, signatures, and receipts; any missing item will affect issuance and acceptance.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by workflow nodes (user selection and branching), outputting branch direction and interaction state records. The "issuable material drafts and handover records" are completed by subsequent nodes continuing execution according to the branch. When a node is triggered, the conversation enters an interaction state and records the workflow state; after the user completes the selection, execution continues along the branch corresponding to the selected option.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Competition regulations | Whether the event name, group, time and location, scoring criteria, and signature fields are complete, and whether the version and date are consistent | Check the regulation fields item by item, compare the signature fields with the signing date, and confirm that the version number matches the current round |
| Registration form | Whether contestant name, student ID, major, supervising instructor, and contact information correspond to the group and event in the regulations, and whether the seal and receipt are complete | Compare personnel and quantities one by one against the regulations, check the seal and receipt, reference variables to record the selection result, and run a trial once |
| Training plan | Whether phase objectives, week numbers, venue, equipment, and responsible person are consistent with the regulation timeline, and whether signatures are complete | Check the week numbers against the regulation dates, check the responsible person's signature, and reference nodeId and variables in subsequent nodes to verify the branch direction |
| Handover record | Whether the handing-over parties, handover date, material version, and acceptance status are consistent with the materials handed over | Check the handover record against the material version number, confirm that the acceptance field is filled in, and check whether the receipt is passed along with the branch |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the same contestant's name or quantity does not match across two materials. Cause: the registration form and training plan were revised separately and were not synchronized to the same version.
- Symptom: the dates or versions of the regulations and training plan are not synchronized. Cause: after a schedule adjustment, only one material was changed while the other still used the old version.
- Symptom: the handover record lacks a signature or receipt. Cause: materials were circulated first and signed later, and the acceptance step was not bound to the branch direction.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: run trials option by option, check the branch direction and interaction state in the run records, confirm that each option corresponds to one branch, and that the selection result variable has been passed to subsequent nodes.
Business test: draft one set according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, trigger it once, and then view the node status in the run records.
- Reference the selection result variable in a subsequent node and run a trial once to confirm that the process continues downward after the interaction is completed.