What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the social assessment scenario for vocational skill level certification. Materials include the assessment implementation plan, candidate registration form, and assessor dispatch form. They are submitted by the declaring unit and the assessment institution on a batch basis, and the update cadence rolls with the certification batches. The assessment implementation plan carries the assessment occupation, level, time and location, assessment method, and responsible person; the candidate registration form carries the candidate's identity information, declared occupation and level, and signature confirmation; the assessor dispatch form carries the assessor list, affiliated unit, dispatch date, and receipt acknowledgment. When these three types of materials enter the multi-turn dialogue and prompt features, each plays a different role: the implementation plan serves as the basis for process and responsibility, the registration form serves as the basis for personnel and qualifications, and the dispatch form serves as the basis for execution and handover, jointly supporting signable material drafts and handover records. Field characteristics center on names, quantities, dates, version numbers, and signature fields. If any item does not match between two materials, it will affect receipt at the next stage.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, and outputs the historical message range and answer constraints referenced. The signable material drafts and handover records are then completed by the model, while the external entry point and authorization are handled by the publishing service and file permissions. Memory turns control how many previous turns of dialogue can be referenced at most when answering. If the value is too small, prior context cannot be used; if the value is too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment implementation plan | Check the assessment occupation, level, batch date, assessment method, and responsible person's signature; the version number is consistent with the registration form and dispatch form | In the application settings, check the current memory turns value, run a trial with two consecutive question turns, and check whether the second turn inherits the reference from the first turn; inspect the association scope of messages and chatId, and confirm that the batch field in variables has not crossed files |
| Candidate registration form | Check the candidate's name, declared occupation and level, quantity, registration date, and signature confirmation, consistent with the implementation plan batch | Draft a registration form draft according to the template, go through one handover, and see whether missing signatures or receipts are blocked; compare the usage records of two runs to confirm the consumption change after adjusting the turns |
| Assessor dispatch form | Check the assessor's name, affiliated unit, dispatch date, receipt acknowledgment, and version number, consistent with the responsible person in the implementation plan | Run a trial with two consecutive question turns; in the second question, use a referential follow-up to ask about the dispatch form date, and see whether the answer inherits the first question; check whether the opening message is treated as prior context |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The same candidate name or assessor quantity does not match between the registration form and the dispatch form. Cause: During drafting, the batch field was not unified according to the implementation plan, and the two materials were updated separately.
- Phenomenon: The implementation plan version number is not synchronized with the registration form and dispatch form, and the old version is still used during handover. Cause: After the version update, the prompt constraints did not state that the latest version prevails.
- Phenomenon: The dispatch form lacks the assessor's signature or receipt acknowledgment, so the next stage cannot receive it. Cause: When drafting the draft, the signature field and receipt were not listed as required, and missing items were not blocked.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: Use two consecutive follow-up turns and see whether the second question inherits the reference from the first question; use chatId and messages to check the historical scope, and confirm that the batch field in variables has not crossed files.
Business test: Draft one copy according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- In the application settings, check the current memory turns value, match it with the prior context range required by the question, and after adjustment compare the usage records of two runs.
- Draft one assessment implementation plan, candidate registration form, and assessor dispatch form according to the template, go through one handover, and check that the fields are complete, the responsible person is clear, and the version and date are consistent.