What this category's data looks like
This category's data looks like this: Enterprise independent skilled talent evaluation involves three types of materials: enterprise evaluation filing forms, evaluation specifications, and candidate rosters. The filing form contains the evaluation agency, occupation name, level, date, and seal; the evaluation specification contains assessment modules, weights, scoring criteria, and version number; the roster contains candidate names, ID numbers, declared levels, and signed receipts. The sources of materials are filing applications, specification preparation, and registration summaries. The update rhythm follows batches and policy adjustments. The same record must maintain consistent names, quantities, and dates across the filing form, specification, and roster. When materials enter the knowledge base retrieval service, the filing form and specification provide field templates and clause bases, and the roster provides personnel data. The three are recalled as candidate fragments for subsequent nodes or manual drafting of issuable material drafts and handover records.
Configuration and implementation checks
Configuration and implementation checks: This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate fragments and similarity scores (after mode, merge, rerank, filter, and limit trimming). Issuable material drafts and handover records are then completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise evaluation filing form | Fields complete, responsible person clear, version and date consistent: agency name, occupation name, level, filing date, seal and signature consistent with corresponding items in the evaluation specification and roster | Retrieve filing form fields in the search test, view candidate fragments and similarity scores, and check whether agency name, occupation name, level, date, and signed receipt are complete |
| Evaluation specification | Version number and date synchronized, assessment modules, weights, scoring criteria consistent with the occupation name and level in the filing form, no missing signature or receipt | Switch searchMode to semantic, full-text, or hybrid, compare candidate fragments, and check whether the specification version number and dates in the filing form and roster are consistent |
| Candidate roster | Candidate names, ID numbers, declared levels, and quantities consistent with corresponding records in the filing form and evaluation specification, including signature or receipt | Retrieve roster names and levels, view the number of candidate entries and scores, and check whether the names, quantities, and dates of the same record in the filing form and roster match |
| Retrieval parameters | Candidate fragments and similarity scores are returned after mode, merge, rerank, filter, and limit trimming, with citation count recorded separately | Adjust similarity, limit, and usingReRank in the search test, compare the ranking of the top few entries before and after enabling rerank, and check the cited text tokens and array length |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The same candidate's name and declared level do not match between the roster and the filing form. Cause: The two materials were imported separately, and field verification and association were not performed for the same record.
- Symptom: The evaluation specification version is not synchronized, and the filing form still references the old assessment modules. Cause: The version number and date were not updated with the batch, and historical fragments were mixed into retrieval candidates.
- Symptom: The handover record lacks a signature or receipt, and the next step cannot sign off. Cause: The material draft fields are incomplete, the responsible person is not clear, and item-by-item verification against the template was not performed.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: Test once each with synonym-rewritten questions, compare candidates and scores, then toggle rerank on and off to observe the ranking of the top few entries; check changes in candidate count and scores under searchMode, similarity, limit, and usingReRank.
Business test: Draft one copy according to the template and complete one handover to see whether missing items are blocked.
- In the knowledge base search test, switch
searchModeand compare candidate fragments and similarity scores across semantic, full-text, and hybrid modes. - Enable and disable rerank, compare the order of the top few entries; adjust
similarityandlimit, and check the cited text tokens and array length.