Knowledge Base Retrieval for Professional Qualification Exam Applications: Draft Materials and Hand Over Responsibilities

Professional Exams: review retrieval for material handover. Check source versions, input mappings and the values received by downstream nodes.

What this category's data looks like

This category's data covers three core types of materials for the review of professional and technical personnel vocational qualification examination registration: the registration form, the academic qualification certificate, and the work experience certificate. The registration form contains name, ID number, examination subjects, work unit, and signature field; the academic qualification certificate contains graduating institution, major, graduation date, certificate number, and official seal; the work experience certificate contains start and end dates, position, cumulative years, responsible person's signature, and receipt. The material sources are candidate submissions, documents issued by units, and historical archives, and the update cadence changes with registration batches and review rounds. When entering the knowledge base retrieval service, the registration form serves as the main record anchor, while the academic qualification certificate and work experience certificate serve as cross-verification evidence; together, the three support the determination that fields are complete, responsible parties are clear, and versions and dates are consistent.

Configuration and implementation checks

This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate snippets and similarity scores (after mode, merge, rerank, filter, and limit trimming). The draftable materials and handover records are then completed by subsequent nodes or manually.

ObjectCheckVerification action
Registration formFields are complete: name, ID number, examination subjects, work unit, signature field, and date are consistentIn the search test, test once each with synonymous questions, record the number of candidates and scores, and check searchMode and similarity
Academic qualification certificateFields are cross-consistent with the registration form: graduating institution, major, graduation date, certificate number, official sealSwitch searchMode to compare semantic and full-text candidates, and see whether names and dates match the registration form
Work experience certificateStart and end dates, cumulative years, position, responsible person's signature, and receipt are complete, and the version is synchronized with the registration batchCompare the ranking of the top few items before and after enabling usingReRank, check the tokens of the cited text after limit trimming, and record the number of array items separately
Handover recordThe responsible person is clear, the receipt time and version number are consistent, and missing items are blockedDraft one according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing signatures or receipts are blocked

Three common errors

  • Symptom: The name and date of the same record do not match between the registration form and the academic qualification certificate. Cause: The two materials were drafted separately, without cross-verification and version synchronization.
  • Symptom: The work experience certificate lacks the responsible person's signature or receipt. Cause: The handover step did not check item by item according to the template, and missing items were not blocked.
  • Symptom: There are many candidates, but the ones ranked at the front are all irrelevant. Cause: The retrieval mode does not match the material form, rerank is not enabled, or the similarity filter is not tuned properly.

How to verify the setup

This feature's acceptance: test once each with synonymously rewritten questions, compare candidates and scores, then toggle rerank on and off to see the ranking of the top few items; check searchMode, similarity, usingReRank, and limit.

Business test: draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.

  • In the knowledge base search test, switch retrieval modes, compare the number of candidates and scores, and confirm that the returned candidates include both semantic and full-text results.
  • Compare the order of the top few items before and after enabling rerank, check the tokens of the cited text after similarity filtering and citation limit trimming, and record the number of array items separately.