What this category's data looks like
This page addresses exam organization and violation handling scenarios. Materials mainly come from three types: exam administration manuals, examination room record sheets, and violation fact records. Exam administration manuals provide process nodes and responsibility assignments; examination room record sheets carry time, examination room, invigilators, and candidate behavior; violation fact records focus on factual descriptions, evidence lists, and proposed handling opinions. These materials roll forward with exam batches in terms of update cadence, and their field characteristics center on names, quantities, dates, signatures, and receipts. When entering the multi-turn dialogue and prompts feature, exam administration manuals serve as the rule source document, while examination room record sheets and violation fact records serve as the fact sources. Based on these, the model drafts signable material drafts and handover records, and keeps the name, quantity, and date of the same record consistent across the three materials, with versions and dates synchronized, and signatures and receipts not missing.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, which output the reference range of historical messages and answer constraints. The signable material drafts and handover records are then completed by the model. Memory turns control how many previous dialogue turns are referenced at most when answering. If the value is too small, prior context cannot be used; if too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Exam administration manual | Process nodes, responsibility assignments, version and date are consistent | In the application settings, check the current memory turns value, and use messages to check whether the prior context covers the manual version and effective date |
| Examination room record sheet | Examination room, time, invigilators, candidate behavior, names and quantities match | Run a trial with two consecutive question turns; in the second turn, use a referring expression to follow up on the same record, and check whether the historical messages under chatId carry it forward |
| Violation fact record | Factual description, evidence list, proposed handling opinion, signatures and receipts are complete | Draft one according to the template and complete one handover; check whether missing items are blocked, and whether variables bring in the batch and date |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the examination room record sheet and the violation fact record. Cause: When drafting, the same batch fields were not locked, and the historical message range was insufficient.
- Phenomenon: The exam administration manual version is not synchronized, and old process steps are brought into new materials. Cause: The memory turns value is too large, earlier dialogue is referenced, and the version and date are not updated with the batch.
- Phenomenon: The handover record lacks a signature or receipt, and the next stage cannot sign for acceptance. Cause: The prompt does not constrain the signature and receipt fields, and the model output does not check item by item according to the template.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: Use two consecutive follow-up turns. In the first question, provide a record from the examination room record sheet. In the second question, use a referring expression to follow up on the same record. See whether the second question carries forward the reference from the first question, and check the historical message range under messages and chatId.
Business test: Draft one according to the template and complete one handover. See whether missing items are blocked, and check that fields are complete, responsible persons are clear, and version and date are consistent.
- In the application settings, check the current memory turns value, match it with the prior context range required by the question, and compare the usage records of two runs.
- Run a trial with two consecutive question turns, check whether the second turn correctly carries forward the reference from the first turn, and record the batch and date brought in by
variables.