What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the exam organization and violation handling category. Materials come from three sources: exam organization manuals, examination room record sheets, and violation fact records. The exam organization manual provides organizational procedures and the basis for handling; the examination room record sheet records on-site time, seating, and invigilator signatures; the violation fact record carries the behavior description, evidence list, and confirmation by the person involved. The update cadence advances with exam batches and handling milestones; after each session ends, the invigilator, exam administration, and reviewer enter supplementary records in sequence. Field characteristics center on names, quantities, dates, signatures, and receipts: the same candidate's name spelling, the count of prohibited items, and the date of occurrence in two materials must be aligned item by item, and the version number and issue date must be consistent. When entering the model integration and configuration feature, the three types of materials serve as input sources for dialogue and retrieval; the server completes model binding, and material drafts and handover records are produced by dialogue and retrieval using that model. Missing fields or version mismatches are intercepted during the drafting and handover stages.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, which outputs the model binding relationships and channel responses. Signable material drafts and handover records are then completed by dialogue and retrieval using that model. Models fall into five categories: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition. Different stages bind different model types. The binding relationships and channel responses only determine the invocation path; they do not determine whether personnel can read knowledge base materials.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Exam organization manual | The names, quantities, and dates must be aligned item by item with the examination room record sheet and the violation fact record, and the version and issue date must be consistent | Check the fields against the three types of materials, verify whether signatures and receipts are complete, and confirm that the tokens and array item counts of the quoted text are recorded separately |
| Examination room record sheet | The on-site time, seat number, and invigilator signature must be consistent with the behavior description and evidence list in the violation fact record | Compare the two materials item by item, check whether maxContext and maxTokens match the current stage, and block if a signature or receipt is missing |
| Violation fact record | The confirmation by the person involved, the number of evidence items, and the date of occurrence must correspond to the handling clauses in the exam organization manual; if the version is not synchronized, it must not proceed to the next stage | Check the quoteMaxToken and toolChoice configurations, verify that the number of quoted items and the quote budget are recorded separately, and confirm that the handover record can be signed for |
| Model binding relationships | The five model categories—language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition—correspond to the stages in which they are to be used | In the model configuration, check the type labels and confirm that the model names returned by the channel match the names listed in the documentation |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The same candidate's name is spelled differently in two materials, and the count of prohibited items does not match. Cause: During drafting, entries were not filled back from the same record source, and item-by-item comparison was missing before handover.
- Symptom: The exam organization manual has updated the handling clauses, but the examination room record sheet still references the old version, and the issue dates are misaligned. Cause: The version was not synchronized, and the handover record did not mark the change points.
- Symptom: The violation fact record lacks the signature or receipt of the person involved, yet the material is still advanced to the next stage. Cause: Handover sign-off did not validate the signature and receipt fields, and missing items were not intercepted.
How to verify the setup
This feature's acceptance: run one dialogue and one retrieval, check the model identifiers in the responses, confirm that the language model and the indexing model are bound to their corresponding stages respectively, and check that the values of maxContext, maxTokens, quoteMaxToken, and toolChoice in the responses are consistent with the configuration.
Business test: draft one document according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are intercepted.
- In the model configuration, check whether the type labels of the five model categories match the model names returned by the channel, and confirm that the channel and key source correspond to the connected service.
- Check the names, quantities, dates, signatures, and receipts item by item against the exam organization manual, examination room record sheet, and violation fact record, and confirm that the version and issue date are consistent before proceeding to handover sign-off.