What this category's data looks like
In the examination organization and violation handling category, materials include examination manuals, examination room record sheets, and violation fact records. The examination manual specifies processes and field requirements, the examination room record sheet carries on-site time, location, number of people, and invigilator signatures, and the violation fact record carries the fact description, evidence list, party confirmation, and receipt. The material source is past examination archives and template revisions, and the update cadence is synchronized with examination batches and institutional adjustments. Field characteristics are name, quantity, date, version number, signature field, and receipt field. When entering the knowledge base retrieval service, the examination manual is recalled as the rule basis, and the examination room record sheet and violation fact record are recalled as fact fragments, to be used for drafting issuable material drafts and handover records.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate fragments and similarity scores (after mode, merge, rerank, filter, and limit trimming). The issuable material drafts and handover records are completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Examination manual | Fields complete, responsible person clear, version and date consistent | In the search test, check whether the name, quantity, date, version number, and signature field match the template, and record the number of candidates and the score |
| Examination room record sheet | The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match across the two materials | Switch searchMode to semantic, full-text, or hybrid, compare whether the candidates include both on-site fields and rule fields, and record the similarity score |
| Violation fact record | Missing signature or receipt, version not synchronized | Compare the order of the first few items before and after enabling usingReRank, and check whether the evidence list, party confirmation, and receipt field are complete |
| Handover record | Responsible person clear, version and date consistent | Draft one according to the template and complete one handover, see whether missing items are blocked, and record the number of candidates and the score |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match across the two materials. Cause: The recalled fragments come from different versions or different sources, and hit and association checks were not performed.
- Symptom: The version is not synchronized, and signatures or receipts are missing. Cause: When drafting the materials, field-by-field comparison against the template was not performed, and missing items were not blocked during the handover step.
- Symptom: There are many candidates, but the ones ranked first are all irrelevant. Cause: The retrieval mode does not match the material form, rerank was not enabled, or similarity filtering and citation limit trimming were not performed.
How to verify the setup
This feature acceptance: test once each with synonym-rewritten questions, compare candidates and scores, then toggle rerank to observe the ordering of the first few items; switch searchMode to observe the number of candidates, record similarity and limit, and check the order before and after usingReRank.
Business test: draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- In the search test, switch the retrieval mode, compare the number of candidates and the score, and check the name, quantity, date, version number, and signature field.
- Compare the order of the first few items before and after enabling rerank, check the tokens and array length of the cited text, and record them separately.