What this category's data looks like
This page is intended for enterprise compliance and security training scenarios. It collects three types of materials that can be issued: compliance training courseware, security operating procedures, and exam records, along with the accompanying handover records. The materials come from drafting by the training lead, review by the security administrator, and issuance by the department head. They are updated according to the training cycle and the pace of policy revisions, usually synchronized once after each training round, and immediately re-versioned when policies change. The field characteristics are concentrated in: material name, version number, preparation and issuance dates, responsible person's signature, receipt status, trainee list, and assessment results. When entering the Model Access and Configuration feature, the three types of materials are referenced as corpus for dialogue and retrieval, and the handover records are retrieved and verified as process evidence; the model is only responsible for generating and recalling according to the binding relationships, and does not replace permission determination. Whether materials can be read is still determined by knowledge base permissions.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, outputting model binding relationships and channel responses. The issuable material drafts and handover records are then completed by subsequent AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. On the configuration side, only the five types of models—language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition—are bound by stage, and the model identifiers available on the channel side are returned.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance training courseware | The name, version number, preparation date, and issuance signature must be consistent with the handover record | Check the courseware cover against the handover record item by item for name, version, date, and signature, and check whether receipts are fully attached |
| Security operating procedures | The quantity and applicable position list must correspond to the exam records, and the date must not be earlier than the policy release date | Extract the number of procedure items and compare them with the number of positions in the exam records, and check whether the version and effective date are synchronized |
| Exam records | The examinees, scores, signatures, and receipts must be bound to the courseware version number | Check whether the courseware version in the record is consistent with the current courseware version, and check for missing signatures or missing receipts |
| Model binding relationships | Language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition correspond by stage | In the model configuration, check the type labels, channel and key sources, and model identifiers, and confirm that maxContext, maxTokens, and quoteMaxToken match the stage |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name and date of the same training record do not match between the courseware and the handover record. Cause: Drafting and handover each maintain their own fields and are not checked against the same version as the baseline.
- Symptom: After changing models, the answer style changes abruptly, and the wording of material drafts is inconsistent with existing versions. Cause: The model identifier change was not synchronized to the material templates and retrieval stage.
- Symptom: The handover record lacks a signature or receipt, but the material has already entered the next stage. Cause: Before issuance, the template was not used to check whether the signature and receipt fields were complete.
How to verify the setup
This feature acceptance: run one dialogue and one retrieval, check the model identifiers in the responses, confirm that the language model and indexing model hit their corresponding stages respectively, and check whether maxContext, maxTokens, and quoteMaxToken take effect by stage.
Business test: draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- In the model configuration, check item by item whether the model type labels, channel and key sources, and model identifiers are consistent with the connected service.
- Check the material drafts and handover records against the template for completeness of fields, clarity of responsible persons, and consistency of versions and dates.