What this category's data looks like
This category's data covers material drafting and responsibility handover for self-funded study abroad application services, involving three types of materials: study abroad service contracts, school application forms, and personal statements. Contract fields include service scope, fee terms, signatures of both parties, and dates; application form fields include name, date of birth, education, major, and submission date; the personal statement is narrative text and must be consistent with the contract and application form in name, quantity, and dates. Material sources are consultant drafting, client confirmation, and school receipts, with an update cadence that rolls with application rounds and deadlines. When entering the knowledge base retrieval and recall function, the contract and application form serve as the basis for structured field verification, and the personal statement serves as the recall target for text fragments; together, the three support the issuable material draft and handover record.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate fragments and similarity scores (after pattern, merge, re-rank, filter, and upper-limit trimming). The "issuable material draft and handover record" is completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Study abroad service contract | Fields are complete, responsible parties are clear, version and date are consistent; name, quantity, and date match across the three materials | In the knowledge base search test, search with contract clause keywords, switch searchMode to semantic, full-text, or hybrid, record the number of candidates and scores, and check whether signature and date fields are recalled |
| School application form | Name, date of birth, education, major, and submission date fields are complete and consistent with the contract and personal statement | Search separately with application form field names and field values, enable usingReRank to compare the ranking of the top few results, and check whether candidate fragments cover signature and receipt fields |
| Personal statement | Name, quantity, and dates in the narrative text are consistent with the contract and application form, and can be identified when the version is not synchronized | Search with personal statement paragraph keywords, adjust similarity to observe the candidate filtering effect, and record the number of returned citations and the tokens of the cited text |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the contract and the application form. Cause: During material drafting, verification was not based on the same field source, and retrieval candidates did not cover cross-fields.
- Symptom: The personal statement version is not synchronized, and the old draft and the new draft are recalled at the same time. Cause: The knowledge base update cadence is out of step with application rounds, and the version identifier does not change with material changes.
- Symptom: The contract lacks a signature or receipt, and the handover record cannot be signed off. Cause: Retrieval candidates do not hit the signature and receipt fields, and responsibility handover lacks field-level interception.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: test once each with synonym-rewritten questions, compare candidates and scores, then toggle re-ranking on and off to see the ranking of the top few results; record the number of candidates and scores, adjust similarity and limit to observe changes in the number of citations, and check the tokens of the cited text and the array count and record them separately.
Business test: draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are intercepted.
- In the knowledge base search test, switch
searchModeto semantic, full-text, or hybrid, record the number of candidates and scores respectively, and check whether the fields and dates of the contract, application form, and personal statement are recalled. - Enable
usingReRankto compare the ranking of the top few results, adjustsimilarityandlimitto observe candidate filtering and citation upper-limit trimming, and confirm that the tokens of the cited text and the array count are recorded separately.