What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the scenario of regular higher education institution admissions enrollment and filing. The material sources are the enrollment plans, filing rules, and admission rosters issued by provincial admissions and examination institutions, as well as the proposed admission lists and handover forms filled in and returned by institutions. The update cadence follows the filing milestones of each batch: before filing, verify the plan and rule fields; after filing, update the roster and receipt by round. Field characteristics center on institution code, major group, planned number, filing ratio, minimum score, admitted number, signature, and date. When materials enter multi-turn dialogue and prompt configuration, the enrollment plan and filing rules serve as prior context constraints, while the admission roster and handover records serve as the objects to be drafted. Based on this, the model generates signable drafts and handover records for acceptance in the next step.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, and the output references the historical message range and answer constraints. "Signable material drafts and handover records" are then completed by the model. Memory turns control how many previous dialogue turns can be referenced at most when answering. If the value is too small, prior context cannot be used; if the value is too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Enrollment plan | Institution code, major group, planned number, date, and signature must be consistent with the filing rules | Check the memory turns value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, and confirm that the second turn inherits the references from the first turn; check whether the plan fields in messages are fully referenced |
| Filing rules | Filing ratio, batch, and date must match the enrollment plan and admission roster | Compare the usage records of two runs, check whether the rule fields in the session corresponding to chatId are correctly carried in with the turns, and avoid treating the opening message as prior context |
| Admission roster | Admitted number, minimum score, signature, and receipt must be the same version and date as the plan and rules | Draft one according to the template and complete one handover, check whether the name, quantity, and date of the roster and handover record are consistent, and whether missing signatures or receipts are blocked |
| Handover record | Responsible person, version, and date must be clear and from the same source as the roster | Check whether the handover fields in variables are complete, and confirm whether interception is triggered when the version is not synchronized or the receipt is missing |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the enrollment plan and the admission roster. Cause: The prior context range brought in by the multi-turn dialogue does not match, and the model references fields from an old turn.
- Phenomenon: The filing rules and handover record versions are not synchronized, and signatures or receipts are missing. Cause: The memory turns are too large and bring in irrelevant content, or too small and fail to use prior context constraints.
- Phenomenon: When the second question uses references, the answer does not address the question, and responses become slower with increased consumption. Cause: The consecutive follow-up does not correctly inherit the references from the first turn, and the opening message is treated as prior context.
How to verify the setup
This feature acceptance: Ask two consecutive follow-up questions and see whether the second question inherits the references from the first question; check the reference scope of the three identifiers messages, chatId, and variables in the session, and confirm that the number of references and quoteMaxToken are recorded separately.
Business test: Draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- Check the current memory turns value in the application settings, match it with the prior context range required by the question, and save.
- Run a trial with two consecutive questions, compare the usage records of the two runs, and confirm that consumption changes accordingly after adjusting the turns.