What this category's data looks like
In the enrollment and filing stage of general higher education institution admissions, materials revolve around three axes: enrollment plans, filing rules, and admission rosters. Enrollment plans include institution-major groups, planned numbers, selected subjects, batches, dates, and handler signatures; filing rules include filing ratios, ranking items, tie-breaking handling, version numbers, and responsible persons; admission rosters include candidate numbers, names, filing scores, majors, admission statuses, and receipts. Sources are provincial admissions agencies and higher education institution admissions offices; the update cadence adjusts dynamically with batch progression and supplementary volunteer recruitment; field characteristics are multi-table intersection, date sensitivity, and signature traceability. When materials enter the model integration and configuration function, enrollment plans, filing rules, and admission rosters serve as knowledge sources for dialogue and retrieval. Model binding relationships determine whether these materials can be correctly indexed and reranked, channel responses determine whether calls succeed, and the materials themselves are still completed for issuance and handover by dialogue and retrieval.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, outputting model binding relationships and channel responses. Draft materials that can be issued and handover records are subsequently completed by AI nodes, code nodes, or humans. Models are divided into five categories: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition. Different steps bind different model types, and type annotations and channel sources must be checked item by item in the configuration.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Enrollment plan | Name, quantity, date, and signature must be consistent with the filing rules | Check the planned number, selected subjects, and batch dates, inspect handler signatures and version numbers, and confirm the indexing model binding and type annotation |
| Filing rules | Version number, date, and responsible person must correspond to the admission roster | Check the filing ratio, ranking items, and tie-breaking handling, compare dates and signatures in the two materials, and confirm the reranking model binding and channel response |
| Admission roster | Candidate number, name, score, and admission status must match the plan and rules | Check roster fields and receipts, inspect for missing signatures or receipts, confirm the language model binding, and record maxContext, maxTokens, quoteMaxToken |
| Model binding relationship | The model type corresponds to the step in which it is to be used, and the model identifier is consistent with the name listed in the documentation | Check the type annotation in the model configuration, compare it with the model name returned by the channel, and confirm that toolChoice is available |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The same candidate's name or score does not match between the enrollment plan and the admission roster. Cause: The two materials are maintained separately, cross-checking against the same record was not performed, and dates and versions were not synchronized.
- Symptom: The filing rules have been updated, but the admission roster still references the old version, and the signature field is blank. Cause: The version was not synchronized, receipts and signatures were not checked during handover, and missing items were not blocked.
- Symptom: Retrieval reports indexing-model-related errors, or the answer style changes abruptly after switching models. Cause: The model type is inconsistent with the step binding, channel key authentication fails, and the model identifier does not match the documentation name.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this function: run one dialogue and one retrieval, check the model identifier in the response, confirm that the language model and indexing model binding relationships are correct, record maxContext, maxTokens, quoteMaxToken, and record the number of citations separately without comparing it for equality with the citation budget.
Business test: draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- In the model configuration, check item by item the model type annotation, channel and key source, and model identifier, and compare them with the model name returned by the channel.
- Check field by field the names, quantities, dates, and signatures according to the enrollment plan, filing rules, and admission roster, and inspect whether version numbers and receipts are complete.