What this category's data looks like
This page is intended for university admissions physical examination organization and, centering on three types of materials—physical examination forms, re-examination applications, and restricted-major notifications—sets out the field and flow requirements from material drafting to responsibility handover. The physical examination form contains the candidate's basic information, past medical history, internal medicine, surgery, and otolaryngology examination items, the chief examining physician's opinion, and the date and signature; the re-examination application contains the re-examination items, the original examination conclusion, the reason for application, the approver, and the receipt; the restricted-major notification contains the name of the restricted major, the basis for the restriction, the notification date, and the candidate's acknowledgment of receipt. The three types of materials play different roles in the model access and configuration step: the physical examination form is the master record, while the re-examination application and the restricted-major notification are derived materials, and their names, quantities, and dates must be consistent with the master record. Materials are updated by admissions batch; after each round of physical examinations ends, drafts are consolidated and handed over to the next step for acknowledgment of receipt, and versions and dates are synchronized with the batch.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the server-side model channel configuration and outputs the model binding relationships and channel responses. The material drafts and handover records that can be issued are completed subsequently by AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. The channel key only affects whether the call can succeed; configuring the model does not mean that business data permissions are configured.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Physical examination form | Fields complete, responsible person clear, version and date consistent | Check the candidate information, examination items, chief examining opinion, and signature date; against the model name returned by the channel, check whether maxContext and maxTokens cover the length of the form text |
| Re-examination application | Re-examination items, original examination conclusion, approver, and receipt complete | Check that the re-examination item names are consistent with the physical examination form, the original conclusion date is traceable, and the approval signature and receipt are complete; check whether quoteMaxToken is enough to hold the quoted content |
| Restricted-major notification | Restricted major name, basis, notification date, and acknowledgment of receipt complete | Check that the restricted major corresponds to the physical examination conclusion, the notification date is not earlier than the physical examination date, and the candidate's acknowledgment of receipt is complete; check the value of toolChoice in the retrieval configuration |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The names, quantities, and dates of the same record do not match between the physical examination form and the re-examination application. Cause: The two materials were drafted separately and were not backfilled based on the master record.
- Symptom: The restricted-major notification has been issued, but the version of the physical examination form has not been updated synchronously. Cause: The version and date were not refreshed uniformly with the batch, and no check was made at handover.
- Symptom: The re-examination application lacks the approval signature or receipt. Cause: The handover record only registered the material name and did not check the signature and receipt fields item by item.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: run one conversation and one retrieval, check that the model identifier in the response is consistent with the name listed in the document, and confirm that the indexing model and reranking model are bound to the corresponding steps respectively.
Business test: draft one copy according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- In the model configuration, check the type labels and confirm that language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition are bound to the steps in which they are to be used.
- Check the channel configuration and key source, confirm that the channel is consistent with the service being accessed, and check the model identifier against the model name returned by the channel.