What this category's data looks like
This category's data looks like this: In the material drafting and responsibility handover stages of college admissions physical examination organization, three types of materials are mainly produced: physical examination forms, re-examination applications, and restricted major notifications. Physical examination form fields include name, ID number, past medical history, physical examination conclusion, and physician signature; re-examination applications include the applied item, original conclusion, application date, and applicant signature; restricted major notifications include the restricted major name, restriction basis, notification date, and candidate or parent acknowledgment. The source is templates provided by the on-campus physical examination station and admissions office, and the update cadence is adjusted according to admissions batches, with version numbers and dates needing to stay in sync. When the materials enter the knowledge base retrieval and recall function, each serves as a candidate segment source, used to compare whether the name, quantity, and date of the same record are consistent across different materials, and to check whether signatures and receipts are complete.
Configuration and implementation checks
Configuration and implementation checks: This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate segments and similarity scores (after pattern, merge, rerank, filter, and upper-limit trimming). The material drafts and handover records that can be issued are completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Physical examination form | Fields are complete, the responsible person is clear, and version and date are consistent; the physical examination conclusion and physician signature must not be missing | Retrieve the physical examination form template in the search test, verify the name, ID number, physical examination conclusion, signature, and date fields; use searchMode to switch between semantic, full-text, or hybrid, and compare the number of candidates and scores |
| Re-examination application | The applied item, original conclusion, application date, and applicant signature are complete, and are consistent with the physical examination form conclusion | Retrieve the re-examination application, verify whether the original conclusion and the physical examination form conclusion have the same name and value; check whether the application date and the physical examination form date are the same version; see whether the candidates include both semantic and full-text results |
| Restricted major notification | The restricted major name, restriction basis, notification date, and acknowledgment are complete, and correspond to the physical examination form conclusion | Retrieve the restricted major notification, verify whether the restricted major name and the physical examination form conclusion are consistent; check the acknowledgment and receipt; enable usingReRank to compare the ranking of the top few items, filter by similarity, and record the number of candidates and scores |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name and conclusion date of the same candidate do not match between the physical examination form and the re-examination application. Cause: The two materials were drafted separately, were not checked against the same record version, and the retrieval candidates did not hit both places at the same time.
- Symptom: The restricted major notification has been updated, but the physical examination form still uses the old version of the restriction basis. Cause: The versions were not synchronized, retrieval was not filtered by date and version, and candidate segments were mixed with old-version content.
- Symptom: The re-examination application lacks the applicant signature, and the restricted major notification lacks the receipt. Cause: The handover record did not list signatures and receipts as required fields, and the retrieval candidates did not cover the acknowledgment fields.
How to verify the setup
How to verify the setup: For this function's acceptance: test once each with synonym-rewritten questions, compare candidates and scores, then toggle rerank on and off to inspect the ranking of the top few items; switch searchMode to observe changes in the number of candidates and scores, enable usingReRank to compare ranking, filter by similarity and separately record the array length, and when a citation upper limit is involved, check the tokens of the cited text.
Business test: Draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- In the knowledge base search test, use synonym questions to retrieve the physical examination form, re-examination application, and restricted major notification, record the number of candidates and scores, and compare the result differences among the three
searchModemodes. - Compare the ranking of the top few items before and after enabling
usingReRank, check whether the cited text retains key segments after filtering bysimilarity, and separately record the array length.