Multi-Turn Conversation and Prompts for Adult College Entrance Applications and Admissions: Draft Materials and Hand Over Responsibilities

Adult Admissions: review conversation for material handover. Check source versions, input mappings and the values received by downstream nodes.

What this category's data looks like

Adult college entrance examination registration and admission management involves three core types of materials: registration forms, care bonus-point materials, and admission rosters. Registration forms come from candidates' submission and confirmation, and contain name, ID number, application level, subject category, photo, and signature; care bonus-point materials are submitted by candidates as original certificates and copies, and contain bonus-point items, certificate numbers, review opinions, and receipts; admission rosters are generated by admissions institutions by batch, and contain candidate number, admitted major, study mode, admission date, and responsible person's signature and seal. Materials are updated in three stages: registration, review, and admission, and fields are fine-tuned with batches and policies. When entering the multi-turn dialogue and prompts feature, registration forms and bonus-point materials serve as drafts to be prepared, and admission rosters serve as the basis for result verification; together, the three support issuable drafts and handover records.

Configuration and implementation checks

This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in application settings, and outputs the historical message range and answer constraints referenced. Issuable material drafts and handover records are then completed by the model, while external entry points and authorization are handled by the publishing service and file permissions. Memory turns control how many previous dialogue turns are referenced at most when answering; if the value is too small, prior context cannot be used, and if the value is too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.

ObjectCheckVerification action
Adult college entrance examination registration formFields are complete, responsible persons are clear, version and date are consistent, and signatures and receipts are not missingCheck the memory turns value in application settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, and check whether the second question inherits the reference from the first question
Care bonus-point materialsBonus-point items, certificate numbers, review opinions, and receipts are complete, and dates are consistent with the registration formCompare the usage records of two runs, confirm that consumption changes accordingly after adjusting the turns, and check the historical range in messages
Admission rosterCandidate number, admitted major, study mode, admission date, and signature and seal are complete, and names and quantities match the registration formDraft one according to the template and complete one handover, and check whether chatId and variables are correctly brought in with the record
Handover recordResponsible person, receipt time, version number, and material names are consistent, and missing items are blockedCheck whether the fields in the handover record correspond item by item with the corresponding materials, and confirm that there are no missing signatures or receipts

Three common errors

  • Phenomenon: The same candidate's name is written differently in the registration form and the admission roster. Cause: The two places were entered separately and no name and quantity comparison was made, and versions were not synchronized.
  • Phenomenon: The date of the care bonus-point materials does not match the confirmation date of the registration form. Cause: The same version was not locked when drafting the materials, and the date field was not checked during handover.
  • Phenomenon: The admission roster lacks the responsible person's signature or receipt. Cause: The handover record did not set signatures and receipts as required, and missing items were not blocked.

How to verify the setup

Acceptance of this feature: ask two consecutive follow-up questions, see whether the second question inherits the reference from the first question, and check whether the historical range in messages and the introduction of variables are correct.

Business test: draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.

  • Check the current memory turns value in application settings, and match it with the prior context range required by the question.
  • Run a trial with two consecutive questions, confirm that the second round correctly inherits the reference from the first round, and compare the usage records of the two runs.