What this category's data looks like
This page addresses adult college entrance examination registration and admission management. Materials include three categories: registration forms, care bonus point materials, and admission rosters. Registration forms are filled out by candidates and initially reviewed by registration points, containing name, ID number, application level, subject category, photo, signature, and date; care bonus point materials are submitted by candidates and verified by reviewers, containing bonus item, certificate name, number, issuance date, and review signature; admission rosters are compiled by admissions institutions, containing candidate number, admitted major, study mode, admission date, and responsible person's signature. The three material categories are updated intensively by registration season, with rosters supplemented during the admission stage. After entering knowledge base retrieval, registration forms focus on field completeness and signature verification, care bonus point materials focus on consistency of certificate name, number, and date, and admission rosters focus on quantity, major name, and version synchronization, each serving as candidate fragment sources participating in recall and reranking.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate fragments and similarity scores (after pattern, merge, rerank, filter, and limit trimming). Material drafts that can be issued and handover records are completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Adult college entrance examination registration form | Fields complete: name, ID number, application level, subject category, photo, signature, date | In search test, search by combining field names and candidate number, check candidate count and score, confirm signature and date fragments are recalled |
| Care bonus point materials | Bonus item, certificate name, number, issuance date, and review signature are consistent | Switch searchMode to hybrid, check whether the name, number, and date of the same certificate correspond in the two materials |
| Admission roster | Candidate number, admitted major, study mode, admission date, responsible person's signature, and version are synchronized | Compare the top few rankings before and after enabling usingReRank, check whether major names and quantities are consistent in the two materials |
| Handover record | Responsible person is clear, version and date are consistent, signature or receipt is present | Draft one according to the template and complete one handover, observe whether missing items are blocked, record candidate count and score |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name or major name of the same candidate does not match in the two materials. Cause: Candidate fragments come from different recall channels and are not merged and checked against the same record; hits and associations must be verified first.
- Symptom: The admission roster version is not synchronized, and date and signature are missing. Cause: Materials were not re-retrieved after updating; the citation limit trimming only affects the tokens of the cited text, and the array count is recorded separately.
- Symptom: The answer lacks key paragraphs, and although there are many candidates, the ones ranked first are irrelevant. Cause: The retrieval mode does not match the material form, reranking is not enabled, or the similarity filter threshold is inappropriate.
How to verify the setup
In the knowledge base search test, search the same question with paraphrased wording, compare candidate count and score, and confirm key fragments are not missed.
Check the tokens of the cited text and the array count, record them separately, and do not compare the citation count with the citation content budget as equal.
- Acceptance of this feature: test once each with synonym-rewritten questions, compare candidates and scores, then toggle reranking to observe the top few rankings; record the values of
similarity,limit,searchMode,usingReRankand the candidate count. - Business test: draft one according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.