What this category's data looks like
This page addresses material drafting and handover of responsibility in National Key R&D Program project applications, covering project application forms, budget application forms, and cooperation agreements. The material sources are the application notices for each special program, internal unit templates, and the signed receipts from the previous stage, and the update cadence keeps pace with application batches and guideline adjustments. Field characteristics center on project name, undertaking unit, person in charge, budget subject, cooperating party, start and end dates, and signature fields. When the three types of materials enter the multi-turn dialogue and prompt features, their roles differ: the project application form handles the main-body drafting of the technical route and task breakdown, the budget application form handles the verification of funding subjects and quantity calibers, and the cooperation agreement handles the handover confirmation of cooperating party names, division of labor, and signing dates. Drafts and handover records must have complete fields, a clear responsible person, and consistent versions and dates before they can be handed to the next stage for signing and receipt.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the app settings, and the output references the historical message range and answer constraints. "Signable material drafts and handover records" are then completed by the model. Memory turns control how many previous dialogue turns can be referenced at most when answering; if the value is too small, the preceding text cannot be used, and if the value is too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Memory turns | Matches the range of preceding text required by the question | Check the current value in the app settings, and run a trial with two consecutive questions to observe whether the second round can carry forward the references from the first round |
| Project application form | The project name, undertaking unit, person in charge, start and end dates, and signature fields are complete, and are consistent with the same-item record in the budget application form | Check item by item against the budget application form for name, quantity, and dates, and check whether the version number and signing date are synchronized |
| Budget application form | The budget subject, quantity, and unit price caliber are consistent with the division of labor in the cooperation agreement, and signatures or receipts are not missing | Cross-compare with the cooperation agreement for cooperating party names and amount calibers, and confirm that the receipt has been included in the handover record |
| Cooperation agreement | The cooperating party names, division of labor, and signing dates are consistent with the project application form, and it can block when versions are not synchronized | Check the signature page and receipt, and check whether the name and date of the same record match in the two materials |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the project application form and the budget application form. Cause: The two were drafted separately and were not compared using the same version.
- Symptom: The cooperation agreement has already changed the division of labor, but the project application form still uses the old version. Cause: The versions were not synchronized, and only signatures were checked during handover, not content.
- Symptom: The handover record lacks a signature or receipt, and the next stage refuses acceptance. Cause: There is no item-by-item blocking of missing items according to the template between drafting and signing receipt.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: Run a trial with two consecutive follow-up questions. In the first question, provide the project name and person in charge; in the second question, use a reference to follow up on the budget subject. See whether the second question carries forward the reference from the first question, and check whether messages and variables are brought in as expected under chatId.
Business test: Draft one copy according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- Check the current value of memory turns in the app settings, and run a trial with two consecutive questions to confirm that the second round can correctly carry forward the references from the first round.
- Draft one copy each of the project application form, budget application form, and cooperation agreement according to the template, cross-check names, quantities, dates, and signature receipts, and complete one handover to see whether missing items are blocked.