What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the drafting of materials and handover of responsibility for the investigation and handling of academic misconduct reports. Sources include report materials, investigation reports, and expert appraisal opinions. The update cadence is round-by-round supplementation after acceptance, with centralized review before finalization. Field characteristics center on names, quantities, dates, and signatures: report materials record the reported person and clue items, investigation reports record verification conclusions and the case handler, and expert appraisal opinions record the appraisal scope and signatories. When materials enter the model integration and configuration function, report materials serve as retrieval-side input, investigation reports serve as the dialogue-side draft, and expert appraisal opinions serve as the basis for citation and reranking. Together, the three support a signable material draft and handover record.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, outputting model binding relationships and channel responses. The signable material draft and handover record are completed subsequently by AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. Configuring the model does not mean business data permissions are configured.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Report materials | Names, quantities, dates, and signatures must be consistent with the investigation report; missing signatures or receipts are blocked | Compare report materials and the investigation report item by item for names, quantities, and dates, and check whether signatures and receipts are complete |
| Investigation report | The version and date must be synchronized with the expert appraisal opinions; the citation limit only checks the tokens of the cited text, and the number of array items is recorded separately | Check the investigation report version number and date, and verify whether quoteMaxToken and maxContext match the cited text |
| Expert appraisal opinions | The signatories, appraisal scope, and date must be consistent with the investigation report; the same record must not have mismatched names in two places | Check the signatories and date of the appraisal opinions, and verify the binding relationship of maxTokens and toolChoice in dialogue and retrieval |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The names, quantities, and dates of the same record do not match between the report materials and the investigation report. Cause: During drafting, fields were not filled back one by one according to the template, and no double comparison was performed before handover.
- Symptom: The investigation report version was not synchronized, and the expert appraisal opinions still cite the old version. Cause: The version and date were not updated with the handover record, and there was no version verification action.
- Symptom: Materials lack signatures or receipts, and the responsible person in the handover record is vacant. Cause: No responsible person was assigned during the receipt step, and receipts did not flow together with the draft.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: run one dialogue and one retrieval, check the model identifier in the response, confirm that the language model and index model are correctly bound, and verify the configuration of maxContext, maxTokens, quoteMaxToken, and toolChoice.
Business test: draft one copy according to the template and complete one handover, and see whether missing items are blocked.
- In the model configuration, verify that the model type label corresponds to the step to be used, check the channel configuration and key source, and verify the model identifier against the model name returned by the channel.
- Check the names, quantities, dates, and signatures of the report materials, investigation report, and expert appraisal opinions field by field according to the template, confirm that the version and date are consistent, and then hand them to the next step for receipt.