What this category's data looks like
The document versions and change maintenance for primary and secondary school admissions organizations involve three types of materials: admission plans, application material checklists, and admission lists. The admission plan contains fields such as admission scope, time nodes, and admission rules; the application material checklist contains material names, number of copies, submission dates, and signature fields; the admission list contains student names, ID numbers, admission batches, dates, and receipt signatures. These three types of materials often enter the knowledge base retrieval node in document form, serving as cited sources for subsequent comparison. In terms of update rhythm, the plan may be fine-tuned after annual release, the checklist is supplemented as policies change, and the list is published in batches. The names, quantities, and dates of the same record in two materials can easily fail to match; when versions are not synchronized, the old version is still cited; missing signatures or receipts result in incomplete evidence. When materials enter this function, each is retrieved as an independent source, cited fragments point back to the original paragraphs, and the version ledger and change records are completed by subsequent nodes or manually based on this.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the citation output of the knowledge base retrieval node, which outputs an array of cited content, each item containing an original text fragment and a source identifier, and the length can be 0. Even if no content is found, the output chain still runs through. The "version ledger and change records" are then completed by subsequent AI nodes, code nodes, or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Admission plan | Fields include admission scope, time nodes, and admission rules; dates and signature fields must be consistent with the current version | Check the selected knowledge base collection and vector model; run a test with a question that has no matching materials, and see whether the citation array is empty while the chain continues |
| Application material checklist | Fields include material names, number of copies, submission dates, and signature fields; the names, quantities, and dates of the same record in two materials must match | Open the citation markers and compare against the source documents; record the number of citations and the quoteMaxToken budget, and do not compare the two for equality |
| Admission list | Fields include student names, ID numbers, admission batches, dates, and receipt signatures; missing signatures or receipts are considered incomplete evidence | Point back to the original paragraphs one by one; check whether the cited fragments in responseData (non-streaming module results returned with detailed output enabled) correspond to the source identifiers |
| Cited content output | The number of returned items matches the materials hit; being empty is also normal | Run a test with a question that has no matching materials, and see whether the output is empty while the chain continues; open the citation markers in the conversation and compare against the source documents |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The names, quantities, and dates of the same record in the admission plan and the application material checklist do not match. Cause: The two materials are maintained separately and are not updated synchronously under the same version number.
- Phenomenon: The admission list has been updated, but the knowledge base still cites the old version of the plan or the old version of the checklist. Cause: Versions are not synchronized, and the old materials have not been taken offline or marked invalid.
- Phenomenon: The application material checklist lacks signatures or receipts, and the cited fragments cannot prove submission status. Cause: The signature page was omitted during material scanning or entry, and the citation only covers the main text.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: ask a question with textual evidence, and check whether the cited content array and citation markers can point back to the original paragraphs; then ask a question with no matching materials, confirm that the array is empty while the chain runs through, and record the number of citations and the quoteMaxToken budget, without comparing the two for equality.
Business test: change one piece of content and see whether the version number and citations are updated synchronously; check the values item by item in the search parameter panel, and check whether the cited fragments in quoteList within responseData correspond to the source identifiers.
- In the node, check the selected knowledge base collections and their vector models, and confirm that the selected knowledge bases use the same vector model.
- Open the search parameter panel and check the values item by item, keeping them consistent with the values set in the knowledge base retrieval section.