What this category's data looks like
Materials for primary and secondary school exam question setting and grading usually include exam specification two-way tables, exam papers, and scoring rubrics. Their sources are paper or electronic documents issued by teaching and research groups, question-setting groups, and school administrative co-signing bodies. The update rhythm changes with exam batches, subjects, and grade adjustments, and the field characteristics are concentrated in names, quantities, dates, and signature fields. The exam specification two-way table carries the distribution of assessment points and the ratio of question types, the exam paper carries questions and score values, and the scoring rubric carries scoring points and deduction explanations. When these three types of materials enter scheduled tasks and automation functions, they respectively serve as registration objects for the version ledger, comparison objects for change records, and verification objects for reference synchronization. Each has a different role, but all must land on the same current version.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by trigger configuration and tool nodes (scheduling capability is not in the tool introduction), and outputs trigger records and execution results. "Version ledger and change records" are completed by business processing according to records or supplementary runs. Tool invocation is decided by the model based on the tool introduction whether to execute; when the model does not need to summarize again, a tool invocation termination node can be connected at the end of the tool to end this invocation.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Exam specification two-way table | Whether fields, dates, and signatures are consistent with the current version | Check the introduction fields and trigger records, confirm execution at the scheduled time and only once, and inspect assessment point names, quantities, dates, and signature fields |
| Exam paper | Whether the names, quantities, and dates of the same record match between the specification table and the exam paper | Look at the process connections and trigger records, compare exam paper question numbers, score values, dates, and receipts, and confirm reference synchronization |
| Scoring rubric | Whether scoring points and deduction explanations reference the current exam paper version | Look at which step the termination node is connected to, confirm that when summarization is not needed it is connected at the end of the tool, and check rubric references and signatures |
| Version ledger and change records | The current version is unique, old versions are traceable, and references are synchronized | Check the ledger version number and change records, and confirm that after changing one piece of content the version number and references are updated synchronously |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: It did not execute at the scheduled time, and the ledger still remains at the old version. Cause: The trigger was not connected to the corresponding tool node, and the process connections and trigger records do not match.
- Phenomenon: The names, quantities, and dates of the same record do not match between the specification table and the exam paper. Cause: The versions were not synchronized, and the two materials were maintained separately.
- Phenomenon: After execution, the model summarized it again, and the same task was executed repeatedly. Cause: A tool invocation termination node was not connected at the end of the tool.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: check the trigger records and execution time, and confirm execution at the scheduled time and only once.
Business test: change one piece of content, and see whether the version number and references are updated synchronously.
- Check the process connections and trigger records, and confirm that the trigger has been connected to the corresponding tool node.
- Check the introduction fields, and confirm that when it should execute is clearly stated.