What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the scenario of student disciplinary actions and appeal processing, focusing on the version ledger and change record maintenance for three types of materials: disciplinary factual materials, disciplinary decision documents, and appeal statements. Disciplinary factual materials record the time, place, persons involved, item names and quantities, and signed confirmation; disciplinary decision documents include the disciplinary basis, disciplinary type, effective date, delivery receipt, and signature; appeal statements include the appeal request, factual reasons, submission date, and receipt record. In the scheduled tasks and automation feature, the three types of materials respectively serve as: factual materials as the baseline source for change comparison, decision documents as the current version release object, and appeal statements as the trigger basis for reference synchronization. The update rhythm is triggered by disciplinary process nodes. When materials enter the feature, a version number is first created, then dates, names, quantities, and signatures are checked item by item by field, ensuring the current version is unique, old versions are traceable, and references are synchronized.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by trigger configuration and tool nodes (scheduled capability is not in the tool introduction), outputting trigger records and execution results. The "version ledger and change records" are completed by business processing according to records or by supplementary runs. Tool invocation is decided by the model based on the tool introduction; when the model does not need to summarize again, a tool invocation termination node can be connected at the end of the tool to end this invocation.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Disciplinary factual materials | Whether fields, dates, and signatures are consistent with the disciplinary decision document | Check the material name, involved quantities, action date, and signature column, and look at the process connections and trigger records |
| Disciplinary decision document | The current version is unique, old versions are traceable, and references are synchronized | Check the version number and reference positions, change one piece of content and see whether the version number is updated synchronously |
| Appeal statement | Whether fields, dates, and signatures are consistent with the disciplinary decision document | Check the appeal request, submission date, and receipt record, and confirm there is no missing signature or receipt |
| Trigger records and execution results | Executed on time and only once, with no duplicate execution | Look at the trigger records and execution time, and confirm the tool invocation termination node is connected at the end of the tool |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the disciplinary factual materials and the disciplinary decision document. Cause: The two materials are maintained separately, without field-level comparison and version association.
- Phenomenon: The disciplinary decision document has been updated, but the appeal statement referencing that decision still points to the old version. Cause: The version was not synchronized, and the reference was not refreshed according to the rule that the current version is unique.
- Phenomenon: The appeal statement lacks a signature or delivery receipt, and the disciplinary decision document lacks a signature. Cause: When the materials entered the feature, the signature column and receipt item were not verified by field.
How to verify the setup
This feature acceptance: look at the trigger records and execution time, and confirm execution on time and only once; when the model does not need to summarize again, confirm the tool invocation termination node has been connected at the end of the tool.
Business test: change one piece of content and see whether the version number and references are updated synchronously.
- Check whether the fields, dates, and signatures of the disciplinary factual materials, disciplinary decision document, and appeal statement are aligned item by item, and record discrepancies.
- Check that in the version ledger the current version is unique, old versions are traceable, and references are synchronized, and confirm there is no duplicate execution in the trigger records and execution results.