What this category's data looks like
Graduate training process management involves materials such as training plans, thesis proposals, and mid-term assessment forms, with fields including course name, credits, date, signature, and receipt. Material sources are scattered across supervisors, colleges, and administrative departments, and the update cadence follows semesters and assessment milestones. When entering the data versioning and change maintenance function, the training plan serves as the baseline for courses and credits, the thesis proposal provides the topic selection and time milestones, and the mid-term assessment form records the stage conclusion and signature status. The three must keep the name, quantity, and date of the same record consistent, and ensure that the current version is unique, old versions are traceable, and references are synchronized.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the HTTP node in the workflow, outputting the response body, status code, and returned fields. The "version ledger and change records" are parsed from the response by subsequent nodes, or handled by an external system according to the agreement to complete the rest. The HTTP node does not replace the external system in writing to the database or approving.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Training plan | Course name, credits, and date must be consistent with the thesis proposal and mid-term assessment form | Use variables in the request body to hold placeholders for course fields, and compare the returned course name and credits |
| Thesis proposal | Topic name, date, and signature status must be aligned with the training plan and mid-term assessment form | Pass Authorization in the request headers, and check the topic name and date in the returned fields |
| Mid-term assessment form | Assessment conclusion, signature, and receipt must be synchronized with the training plan and thesis proposal | View the fully rendered address in the request preview, and check the signature and receipt fields in responseData |
| Request address and path parameters | Placeholder variables can be resolved into actual values | View the fully rendered address in the request preview |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The course name and credits of the same record do not match between the training plan and the thesis proposal. Cause: The request body fields are not mapped according to the external interface agreement, and the variable sources have not been verified.
- Symptom: The mid-term assessment form version is not synchronized, and the old version is still referenced. Cause: Reference synchronization was not triggered after the update, and the version ledger did not record the change.
- Symptom: The thesis proposal or mid-term assessment form is missing a signature or receipt. Cause: The external system did not return the signature field when handling according to the agreement, and the response body does not include the receipt.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: preview the rendered request, check the status code and returned fields, then compare the result against one sample.
Business test: change one piece of content and see whether the version number and references are updated in sync.
- In the variables panel, verify the source of each placeholder, confirming it comes from a global variable, system variable, or the output of a preceding node.
- Use one sample request to compare the response, and check whether the request header names and value sources meet the external system's requirements.