What this category's data looks like
This page focuses on vocational college program setup filing materials, with three core categories: program setup filing forms, talent demand justification, and faculty and equipment lists. The filing form contains the program name, code, program length, enrollment target, signature, and date; the justification materials contain industry positions, demand quantities, survey dates, and sign-off; the faculty and equipment list contains names, professional titles, equipment names, quantities, purchase dates, and receipt confirmations. The three types of materials are submitted separately by the academic affairs office, the secondary colleges, and the personnel and equipment departments, and roll into the knowledge base along with approval, correction, review, and annual updates. When entering knowledge base retrieval and recall, the filing form serves as the primary record locator, the justification materials serve as the demand-basis recall, and the faculty and equipment list serves as the condition-verification recall; together, the three constitute the candidate source for the version ledger and change records.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is performed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate chunks and similarity scores (after pattern, merge, re-rank, filter, and limit truncation). The version ledger and change records are completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Program setup filing form | Whether the fields, dates, and signatures are complete and consistent with the current version | In the search test, search by program name and filing year, check the field completeness and signature dates of the returned candidates, record the number of candidates and scores, and compare the differences after switching searchMode |
| Talent demand justification | Whether the name, quantity, and date for the same program match across the two materials | Search by position name and survey date, check whether the justified quantity is consistent with the enrollment scale in the filing form, see whether the candidates contain both semantic and full-text results, and confirm the ranking before and after usingReRank is enabled |
| Faculty and equipment list | Whether the quantity, purchase date, and receipt confirmation are in sync with the filing form | Search by equipment name and teacher name, check the list quantity against the condition fields in the filing form, inspect the number of returned references and text tokens, and if necessary adjust similarity and limit to observe truncation |
| Version ledger and change records | The current version is unique, old versions are traceable, and references are in sync | After changing one piece of content, search again, compare the scores and number of references of the new and old candidates, and confirm that the old version can still be recalled and that external document references have been synchronized |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date for the same program do not match between the filing form and the justification materials. Cause: The two materials are maintained separately, without field alignment and cross-checking.
- Symptom: The filing form has been updated, but the knowledge base still recalls old-version chunks and references are not synchronized. Cause: The version ledger did not register the change, and the old version was not marked as invalid.
- Symptom: The faculty and equipment list lacks signatures or receipts, but retrieval still returns complete candidates. Cause: The scanned materials were not supplemented with signatures, and no completeness check was performed at ingestion.
How to verify the setup
This feature's acceptance: test once each with synonym-rewritten questions, compare candidates and scores, then toggle re-ranking to see the ordering of the top few results; switch searchMode to observe semantic and full-text results, and record the number of candidates and scores.
Business test: change one piece of content and see whether the version number and references are updated in sync.
- In the knowledge base search test, fix the question, record the number of candidates and scores, and switch
searchModeandusingReRankto compare the ordering of the top few results. - Check the tokens and array length of the returned reference text, and check whether key chunks are retained after
similarityandlimittruncation.