What this category's data looks like
In the social evaluation of vocational skill level certification, three types of materials—evaluation implementation plans, candidate registration forms, and assessor dispatch forms—enter the data version and change maintenance stage. The evaluation implementation plan carries the certification occupation, level, assessment method, and time arrangement; the candidate registration form records candidate identity, application conditions, and contact information; the assessor dispatch form specifies assessor division of labor, arrival date, and signed receipt. The material source is the finalized documents submitted by business departments, and the update cadence rolls with certification batches. Common fields include occupation name, level, date, quantity, signature column, and receipt column. The three types of materials each enter the ledger as independent version objects in the function. Trigger configuration pulls up tool nodes according to batch nodes. Tool nodes output trigger records and execution results. The version ledger and change records are completed by business processing executing according to records or catching up with supplementary runs.
Configuration and implementation checks
This link is executed by trigger configuration and tool nodes (scheduled capability is not in the tool introduction), outputting trigger records and execution results. The "version ledger and change records" are completed by business processing executing according to records or catching up with supplementary runs. Tool invocation is decided by the model based on the tool introduction whether to execute; when the model does not need to summarize again, a tool invocation termination node can be attached at the end of the tool to end this invocation.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation implementation plan | Occupation name, level, assessment date, and signature column are consistent across the three types of materials; the current version is unique and the old version is traceable | Check the introduction fields and process connections, view trigger records; confirm the termination node is attached at the end of the tool, and compare the dates and signatures of the plan with the registration form and dispatch form |
| Candidate registration form | Candidate name, declared occupation, level, and quantity match in the plan and dispatch form; receipt and signature are complete | Retrieve trigger records and execution results, check whether the same record name, quantity, and date are consistent; confirm the old version is traceable and references are updated synchronously |
| Assessor dispatch form | Assessor name, division of labor, arrival date, and signed receipt are consistent with the plan; when the version is not synchronized, the old version can be located | Check the introduction fields and termination node position, view execution results; after changing one piece of content, see whether the version number and references are updated synchronously |
| Version ledger and change records | The current version is unique, the old version is traceable, references are synchronized; the same task is not executed repeatedly | Check ledger entries against trigger records and execution results; confirm execution occurs on time and only once, and supplementary runs are recorded |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The same candidate name or assessor quantity does not match between the registration form and the dispatch form. Cause: The two materials are maintained separately, without field comparison and receipt verification against the same record.
- Phenomenon: The plan has been updated, but the registration form still references the old version's date and level. Cause: The version is not synchronized, references are not updated in linkage with the version number, and the old version is traceable but not marked invalid.
- Phenomenon: The dispatch form lacks a signature or receipt, and after execution the model summarizes it again. Cause: The signature column was not checked, and the termination node was not attached at the end of the tool, resulting in duplicate output.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: check trigger records and execution time, confirm execution occurs on time and only once; check process connections and that the trigger is connected to the corresponding tool node, with the termination node attached at the end of the tool.
Business test: change one piece of content, see whether the version number and references are updated synchronously; confirm the current version is unique, the old version is traceable, and the same task is not executed repeatedly.
- Check the introduction fields and process connections, confirm the trigger is connected to the corresponding tool node, and view trigger records and execution results.
- After changing one piece of content, check whether the version number and references are updated synchronously, confirm the termination node is attached at the end of the tool and the old version is traceable.