What this category's data looks like
This page focuses on three types of materials in enterprise independent skill talent evaluation: the enterprise evaluation filing form, the evaluation specification, and the candidate roster. They respectively carry the filing entity and evaluation scope, the evaluation process and assessment standards, and candidate identity and batch information. In terms of fields, the filing form contains the unit name, filing date, signature, and receipt; the evaluation specification contains the occupation name, level, assessment method, and date; the roster contains name, ID number, application level, batch date, and signature. In terms of update cadence, the filing form is adjusted with policy or entity changes, the evaluation specification is updated with standard revisions, and the roster is supplemented as registration and batches roll forward. When materials enter scheduled tasks and automation features, the filing form and evaluation specification serve as version-controlled objects, and the roster serves as a batch-associated object; together, the three form the source of the version ledger and change records.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by trigger configuration and tool nodes (scheduling capability is not in the tool introduction), outputting trigger records and execution results. The version ledger and change records are completed by business processing according to records or by supplementary runs. The trigger has been connected to the corresponding tool node, the tool introduction clearly states when it should execute, and when the model does not need to summarize again, a tool call termination node can be connected at the end of the tool to end this call.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise evaluation filing form | Whether the fields, date, and signature are consistent with the current version | Check the filing form fields and signature, compare the trigger record and execution time, and confirm that execution occurs on time and only once |
| Evaluation specification | Whether the occupation name, level, assessment method, and date match the filing form | Check the specification fields and date, verify whether the version number and references are updated synchronously, and review the trigger record and execution result |
| Candidate roster | Whether the name, ID number, application level, batch date, and signature match the specification | Check the roster fields and signature, and verify whether the name, quantity, and date of the same record are consistent across the two materials |
| Version ledger and change records | The current version is unique, old versions are traceable, and references are synchronized | Check the version numbers and reference relationships in the ledger, and confirm that old versions are traceable and references have been synchronized |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the filing form and the roster. Cause: The materials are maintained separately, lacking a unified version ledger and change records.
- Phenomenon: The evaluation specification has been revised, but the filing form or roster that references it still points to the old version. Cause: The version was not synchronized, and the reference relationship was not refreshed as the content was updated.
- Phenomenon: The filing form or roster lacks a signature or receipt. Cause: The material circulation step was not executed according to records or supplemented by a rerun, and signatures and receipts were not included in the trigger record verification.
How to verify the setup
This feature's acceptance: review the trigger record and execution time, confirm that execution occurs on time and only once, and that there is no failure to execute on time or repeated execution of the same task.
Business test: change one piece of content, see whether the version number and references are updated synchronously, and check whether the old version is traceable.
- Verify that the trigger has been connected to the corresponding tool node, check the process connections and trigger records, and confirm that the tool introduction clearly states when it should execute.
- Verify that the tool call termination node has been connected when summarization is not needed, and check where the termination node is connected, to avoid the execution being summarized again by the model afterward.