What this category's data looks like
The materials involved in self-funded study abroad application services include study abroad service contracts, school application forms, and personal statements. The material sources are contract signing, institution system submission, and document finalization. The update cadence changes with application rounds, institution deadlines, and signed receipt progression. Field characteristics are concentrated in four categories: name, quantity, date, and signature. The spelling of the same applicant's name, the number of courses, and the submission date in two materials must be consistent, and signatures and receipts must be traceable. When materials enter workflow orchestration, the contract assumes the role of the draft basis for terms and fee standards, the school application form assumes the role of verifying institution fields and submission nodes, and the personal statement assumes the role of tracking document versions and citation synchronization. Together, the three form the comparison basis for the version ledger and change records.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by workflow nodes (user selection and branching), outputting branch directions and interaction status records. The "version ledger and change records" are completed by subsequent nodes continuing execution according to the branch. When the user selection node is triggered, the conversation enters an interactive state and records the workflow status. After the user completes the selection, execution continues along the branch corresponding to the selected option.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Study abroad service contract | Whether the name, quantity, and date of the same record are consistent between the contract and the application form | Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, confirm the correspondence between contract fields and institution fields, and reference variables in a subsequent node to run a trial once |
| School application form | Whether the date and signature receipt are synchronized with the contract agreement | Trigger a user selection node once, view the node status in the run record, and confirm that the application form submission date and contract signing date are not misaligned |
| Personal statement | Whether the document version number and citation source are updated synchronously | Reference nodeId in a subsequent node to locate the citation source, change one piece of content, and observe whether the version number and citation update synchronously |
| Version ledger and change records | The current version is unique, old versions are traceable, and citations are synchronized | Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, confirm that old versions are traceable and citations point to the current version |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name and quantity of the same record do not match between the contract and the application form. Cause: The two materials maintain fields separately, and cross-comparison and receipt verification were not performed in the version ledger.
- Phenomenon: An old version of the personal statement is still cited, and the current version is not synchronized. Cause: After the change, the citation source was not updated, and the version number and citation were not linked.
- Phenomenon: The school application form lacks a signature or receipt. Cause: After the interaction is completed, the process stops and does not continue according to the branch to the signature and receipt verification node.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: Run trials for each option one by one, check the branch direction and interaction status in the run record, confirm that each option corresponds to one branch, and reference variables and nodeId in subsequent nodes to check whether the selection result variable has been passed.
Business test: Change one piece of content and see whether the version number and citation update synchronously.
- Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, confirm that each option corresponds to one branch, and avoid still taking the default branch after selecting an option.
- Trigger a user selection node once, view the node status in the run record, and confirm that the process does not stop after the interaction is completed and that the same session does not repeatedly enter the interaction.