What this category's data looks like
Adult college entrance examination registration and admission management involves three core types of materials: registration forms, care bonus-point materials, and admission rosters. The registration form contains the candidate's basic information, application level, and signature field; the care bonus-point materials contain the bonus-point item, certificate number, review date, and signature; the admission roster contains the candidate number, admitted major, admission date, and the signature of the person in charge. These materials come from different sources and have different update rhythms: the registration form is updated with each registration batch, the care bonus-point materials are updated with review progress, and the admission roster is updated with admission results. When the materials enter workflow orchestration, each plays a different role: the registration form serves as the basic data source, the care bonus-point materials serve as the basis for conditional branching, and the admission roster serves as the basis for the final output. In terms of field characteristics, the three types of materials share the candidate number and name, but their dates and signature fields differ. Version numbers and change descriptions must be recorded separately in the version ledger to ensure that the current version is unique, old versions are traceable, and references are synchronized.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by workflow nodes (user selection and branching), outputting branch directions and interaction state records. The "version ledger and change records" are completed by subsequent nodes continuing execution according to the branch. When a node is triggered, the conversation enters an interactive state and the workflow state is recorded. After the user completes the selection, execution continues along the branch corresponding to the selected option.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Registration form | Whether the fields, dates, and signatures are consistent with the care bonus-point materials | Check whether the candidate number and name match in designation and quantity and whether the dates in the two materials correspond; check whether the signature and receipt are complete; reference nodeId to locate the node |
| Care bonus-point materials | Whether the bonus-point item, review date, and signature are synchronized with the admission roster | Check whether the bonus-point item is consistent with the admitted major and admission date in the admission roster; check whether the version number is updated synchronously; reference variables to pass the selection result |
| Admission roster | Whether the admitted major, date, and signature are consistent with the registration form | Check whether the candidate number and name in the admission roster are consistent with the registration form; check the signature of the person in charge and the receipt; confirm that the current version is unique and old versions are traceable |
| Version ledger and change records | The current version is unique, old versions are traceable, and references are synchronized | After changing one piece of content, check whether the version number increments and whether the referenced locations are updated synchronously; record the change description and the operating node nodeId |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the registration form and the care bonus-point materials. Cause: The two materials are maintained separately, and field-level comparison and synchronization are not performed in the version ledger.
- Phenomenon: The admission roster references old-version registration form data, and the version is not synchronized. Cause: After the change, the reference synchronization check was not triggered, and the old version is still read by downstream nodes.
- Phenomenon: The care bonus-point materials lack a signature or receipt but still enter the admission roster. Cause: The branch judgment did not verify the completeness of the signature and receipt, and the interaction state record did not intercept it.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: Try running each option one by one, check the branch direction and interaction state in the run records, confirm that each option corresponds to one branch, that the selection result variable has been passed to subsequent nodes, and verify by referencing variables and nodeId.
Business test: Change one piece of content, see whether the version number and references are updated synchronously, and confirm that the current version is unique, old versions are traceable, and references are synchronized.
- In the node, check the options and branch connections one by one, trigger it once, and view the node status in the run records.
- Reference the selection result variable in a subsequent node and run it once to confirm that the process continues after the interaction is completed.