What this category's data looks like
The data in this category looks like this: Adult college entrance examination registration and admission management involves three types of materials: registration forms, care bonus point materials, and admission rosters. The sources are annual releases from admissions examination institutions and institutions, and the update pace rolls with policies and batches. Registration forms contain basic candidate information, application level, and signature fields; care bonus point materials contain bonus items, certificate numbers, review dates, and receipts; admission rosters contain candidate numbers, admitted majors, admission dates, and seals. The three types of materials play different roles when entering knowledge base retrieval: registration forms and care bonus point materials provide field and date evidence, while admission rosters provide final results and signature credentials. The names, quantities, and dates of the same record in registration forms and bonus point materials often do not match. When versions are not synchronized, the old version is still recalled, and fragments missing signatures or receipts also enter the candidates.
Configuration and implementation checks
How to configure this: This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate fragments and similarity scores (after pattern, merge, rerank, filter, and upper limit trimming). The version ledger and change records are completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Adult college entrance examination registration form | Whether fields, dates, and signatures are consistent with the current version | In the search test, use synonymous questions to retrieve, switch searchMode to compare the number of candidates and scores, and check the fields and signature fields in the returned fragments |
| Care bonus point materials | Whether bonus items, certificate numbers, review dates, and receipts match | Compare the ranking of the top few items before and after enabling usingReRank, verify the tokens and array count of the cited text, and check whether receipts are missing |
| Admission roster | Whether candidate numbers, admitted majors, and admission dates are consistent with the registration form | Adjust similarity and limit to see whether candidates include both semantic and full-text results, and check the names, quantities, and dates in the roster and registration form |
| Version ledger and change records | The current version is unique, old versions are traceable, and citations are synchronized | After changing one piece of content, retrieve again to see whether the version number and citation count are updated synchronously, and record changes in the number of candidates and scores |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The names, quantities, and dates of the same candidate in the registration form and care bonus point materials do not match. Cause: The versions of the two materials are not synchronized, and old-version fragments are still recalled.
- Phenomenon: The admission roster lacks a signature or receipt, but the answer cites it as valid evidence. Cause: Candidate fragments did not check the signature field, and key paragraphs were truncated after citation upper limit trimming.
- Phenomenon: The same question cannot be recalled when phrased differently, and although there are many candidates, the ones ranked first are all irrelevant. Cause: The retrieval mode does not match the material form, and rerank is not enabled.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: Test once each with synonymously rewritten questions, compare candidates and scores, then toggle rerank on and off to see the ranking of the top few items.
Business test: Change one piece of content and see whether the version number and citations are updated synchronously.
- In the knowledge base search test, switch
searchModeto compare the number of candidates and scores across semantic, full-text, and hybrid modes. - Adjust
similarityandlimit, enableusingReRank, verify the tokens and array count of the cited text, and confirm that the current version is unique.