What this category's data looks like
Signing a research project task book involves three types of materials: the project task book, the subject task breakdown table, and the budget book. Fields include subject name, undertaking unit, start and end dates, funding categories and amounts, signatures, and receipts. Material sources are application system exports, offline stamped scans, and financial-caliber tables, and the update cadence changes with signing rounds and budget adjustments. When entering this function, the project task book serves as the main record providing the signing baseline, the subject task breakdown table carries task and personnel fields, and the budget book carries amount and category fields; the three mutually corroborate each other through the name, quantity, and date of the same record.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the HTTP node in the workflow, outputting the response body, status code, and returned fields. The version ledger and change records are completed by subsequent nodes parsing the response, or by an external system handling them as agreed. The HTTP module sends requests to the target address; path parameters, request body, and request headers can all use variable placeholders, and the variables come from global variables, system variables, or outputs of preceding nodes.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Project task book | Subject name, undertaking unit, start and end dates, and signature page must be consistent with the breakdown table | Take one sample request and compare the return, checking the name, date fields, and signature receipt |
| Subject task breakdown table | Task entries, quantities, and personnel assignments must be the same version as the task book | Check the source of each placeholder in the variable panel, confirming the reference points to the current version |
| Budget book | Funding categories and amounts must be the same version as the task book and breakdown table | Check the request body fields against the external interface agreement, verifying whether amounts and categories match |
| Request header | Authentication information is passed in according to external system requirements | Check the request header names and value sources, confirming the source of the Authorization value |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the same subject's name, quantity, or date does not match across two materials. Cause: the materials were exported separately and were not proofread against the same record.
- Symptom: an old version is still referenced, and after changing one piece of content the version number and reference are not synchronized. Cause: the version ledger was not updated, and the reference points to the old version.
- Symptom: the request returns 401 or the external system receives empty fields. Cause:
Authorizationwas not passed in as agreed, and the placeholder variables were not parsed.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: preview the rendered request, check the status code and returned fields, then compare the result against one sample; check the sources of variables and responseData in the variable panel.
Business test: change one piece of content and see whether the version number and reference are updated in sync.
- In the request preview, view the complete rendered address and confirm the placeholder variables can be parsed into actual values
- Check the request header names and value sources, confirming the authentication information is passed in according to external system requirements