What this category's data looks like
This page addresses material versions and change maintenance in the investigation and handling of academic misconduct reports. The material sources include three categories: report materials, investigation reports, and expert appraisal opinions. Report materials provide original leads and receipts; investigation reports carry the verification process and conclusions; expert appraisal opinions provide professional judgments and signatures. When these three categories of materials enter the version ledger and change record function, each participates as an independent record in the maintenance of version numbers, dates, and signature fields. The update cadence advances according to investigation stages and correction nodes; each modification must synchronize the version number and reference location. Field characteristics center on material name, quantity, date, signature, and receipt, requiring the current version to be unique, old versions to be traceable, and references to be synchronized, avoiding the same record having inconsistent name, quantity, or date across two materials.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by trigger configuration and tool nodes (scheduling capability is not in the tool introduction), outputting trigger records and execution results. The "version ledger and change records" are completed by business processing according to records or by catch-up runs. Tool invocation is decided by the model based on the tool introduction; when the model does not need to summarize again, a tool invocation termination node can be attached at the end of the tool to end this invocation.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Report materials | Name, quantity, date, and receipt fields are unique and traceable in the version ledger | Check the process connections and trigger records to confirm execution at the scheduled time and only once |
| Investigation reports | Version number and reference location are updated synchronously with content changes, and old versions are traceable | Check the introduction fields and where the termination node is attached |
| Expert appraisal opinions | Signature and date are complete, and the same record has consistent name, quantity, and date across two materials | Check the introduction fields and where the termination node is attached |
| Version ledger and change records | The current version is unique, references are synchronized; change one piece of content and see whether the version number updates | Check the process connections and trigger records to confirm execution at the scheduled time and only once |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The same record has inconsistent name, quantity, or date between report materials and investigation reports. Cause: versions are not synchronized, and old-version references are not updated with content changes.
- Symptom: Expert appraisal opinions lack a signature or receipt, yet the version ledger still marks them as current. Cause: signature and receipt fields are not included in change record verification.
- Symptom: Execution does not occur at the scheduled time, or after execution the model summarizes it again, causing the same task to be executed repeatedly. Cause: trigger configuration and tool nodes are not constrained by the introduction and termination node.
How to verify the setup
This feature acceptance: check trigger records and execution time to confirm execution at the scheduled time and only once.
Business test: change one piece of content and see whether the version number and references are updated synchronously.
- Check the process connections and trigger records to confirm the trigger has been connected to the corresponding tool node.
- Check the introduction fields and clearly state when execution should occur.