What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the scenario of progress records and statistical verification for kindergarten play activity organization. Materials come from observation records, area plans, material placement lists, activity goal achievement tables, and reflection-to-next-week plans. The update cadence advances weekly, with observations supplemented midweek and statistics summarized on weekends. Field characteristics include area name, material quantity, goal items, observation facts, exception notes, and aggregation criteria. When entering the knowledge base retrieval and recall function, observation records and area plans serve as semantic recall materials, material placement lists and goal achievement tables serve as full-text recall materials, and reflection-to-next-week plans serve as hybrid recall materials, each taking on the role of candidate segment source, with the subsequent nodes or manual work ultimately generating the progress table and statistical criteria description based on them.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate segments and similarity scores (after pattern, merge, rerank, filter, and upper limit truncation). The progress table and statistical criteria description are then completed by subsequent nodes or manual work.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Observation records and area plans | Whether observation facts correspond to area plans, and whether goals and observations are consistent | In the search test, switch searchMode to semantic, and check whether candidate segments cover both observation and plan items |
| Material placement list | Whether the material placement quantity matches the record count, and whether material shortages are stated as exceptions | Use full-text search to check the number of candidate items, record the candidate count and score, and check whether material shortages appear in candidate segments |
| Activity goal achievement table | Whether goals match observations, and whether goal items correspond one by one | Compare the top few rankings before and after enabling usingReRank, and check whether mismatches between goals and observations are ranked first |
| Reflection-to-next-week plan | Whether the plan is updated, and whether reflections are transferred into the next week's plan | Test once each with synonym-rewritten questions, check candidates and scores, and check whether unupdated plans are recalled |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: Material shortages are not written as exceptions, and the total is still counted according to the planned number. Cause: The material placement list and observation records are not updated synchronously, and candidate segments lack exception notes.
- Phenomenon: Statistics count achievement using the number of goals without resolving conflicting observations. Cause: The activity goal achievement table is not adjusted along with observation records, and retrieval candidates do not cover discrepancy items.
- Phenomenon: The plan is not updated, and the next week's plan still follows the old area arrangement. Cause: The reflection-to-next-week plan does not enter the retrieval materials, and candidate segments do not include updated plan items.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: Test once each with synonym-rewritten questions, compare candidates and scores, then toggle rerank on and off to observe the top few rankings; record the candidate count and score, and when a citation limit is involved, check the tokens of the cited text, recording array item counts separately.
Business test: Use one week's records to verify the total, check whether the criteria and exceptions are clearly stated, confirm that the record count matches the statistical count, and write the criteria into the table header.
- In the knowledge base search test, switch
searchModeto semantic, full-text, or hybrid, compare the candidate count and score, and check whether the material form matches the mode. - Compare the top few rankings before and after enabling
usingReRank, and check whether key original text segments are still retained after similarity filtering and citation limit truncation.