What this category's data looks like
This category's data looks like this: Primary and secondary school admissions organization involves three core types of materials: the admissions plan, the application materials checklist, and the admission list. The admissions plan contains batches, time nodes, and responsibility assignments; the application materials checklist contains field items, number of copies, and signature columns; the admission list contains names, numbers, dates, and receipt status. The materials come from schools and education authorities, are updated by admissions season, and are fine-tuned multiple times within a week. When entering workflow orchestration, the admissions plan serves as the basis for branching, the application materials checklist serves as the draft for field verification, and the admission list serves as the source for statistical aggregation. The field names, quantities, dates, and signatures of the three must be aligned item by item in the progress table and the statistical scope description, with the scope written into the header and exceptions noted separately.
Configuration and implementation checks
Configuration and implementation checks: This step is executed by workflow nodes (user selection and branching), outputting branch directions and interaction status records. The "progress table and statistical scope description" is continued and completed by subsequent nodes according to the branch. After the user completes the selection, the process follows the corresponding option to continue executing the branch.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Admissions plan | Whether the batches, dates, and responsible signatures in the plan are consistent with the progress table | Verify the plan dates and signature columns item by item, check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, and record nodeId |
| Application materials checklist | Whether the checklist fields, number of copies, dates, and signatures match the admission list | Compare the list records one by one according to the checklist fields, and reference variables to check whether the selection result variable has been passed to subsequent nodes |
| Admission list | Whether the list names, numbers, dates, and receipts are consistent with the checklist | Use one week's records to verify the totals, check exception items missing signatures or receipts, and record the variables passing result |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The names, quantities, and dates of the same record do not match between the application materials checklist and the admission list. Cause: The two materials are updated separately, and the field scope has not been unified in the header.
- Phenomenon: The admissions plan version is not synchronized, and the progress table is still counted according to the old batch. Cause: After the plan is updated, the workflow is not triggered to re-enter the interaction status.
- Phenomenon: The admission list is missing signatures or receipts, but the statistical count still includes them in the total. Cause: Exception items are not listed separately in the scope description and are merged during verification.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: Try running each option one by one, check the branch direction and interaction status in the run records, confirm that each option corresponds to one branch, and check whether nodeId and variables are correctly referenced by subsequent nodes.
Business test: Use one week's records to verify the totals, see whether the scope and exceptions are clearly written, and confirm that the number of records matches the statistical count and that the scope is written into the header.
- Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, and trigger once to view the node status in the run records.
- Reference the selection result variable in a subsequent node and run it once, then verify the header and exception items of the progress table and statistical scope description.