What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the primary and secondary school admission enrollment organization scenario; the materials include three categories: admission plans, application material checklists, and admission lists. The admission plan contains batches, time nodes, and responsible positions; the application material checklist lists, student by student, required items such as household registration, property, and residence permit, along with the date received; the admission list contains names, admission batch, and confirmation signature or receipt. The materials mostly come from education authority documents, school admission team meeting records, and registration system export tables. The update rhythm advances with the admission season: the plan comes first, the checklist rolls forward with registration, and the list is finalized after admission. When these three types of materials enter the knowledge base retrieval node, each serves as a citable original source: the plan provides the basis for definitions, the checklist provides item-by-item records, and the list provides result data. The citation output retains the original text snippet and source identifier for subsequent field comparison, date verification, and signature checking, and then feeds into the progress table and statistical definition notes.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the citation output of the knowledge base retrieval node, which outputs an array of cited content, each item containing the original text snippet and source identifier, and the length may be 0. The "progress table and statistical definition notes" are completed afterward by a subsequent AI node, code node, or manual work.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Admission plan | Whether batches, time nodes, responsible positions, and definition criteria are written into the header | In the node, check the selected knowledge base and vector model, open the citation marker, and trace back to the original plan paragraph |
| Application material checklist | Whether the item names, quantities, date received, and signatures of the item-by-item records are consistent with the plan definitions | Use one week of records to verify the totals, compare the checklist and plan fields item by item, and record exceptions and items missing signatures |
| Admission list | Whether names, admission batch, and confirmation signature or receipt match the checklist and plan | Compare the cited snippet with the original text against the source document, and check the name, quantity, and date of the same record in both materials |
| Cited content output | The number of returned items matches the materials hit; being empty is also normal | Run a test with a question that has no matching materials, see that the output is empty while the chain continues, and record the array item count separately |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name, quantity, and date of the same student do not match between the checklist and the list. Cause: The two materials were entered separately, without tracing back to the original text for verification under the same field definitions.
- Phenomenon: The plan has been updated, but the checklist still uses the old batch and time nodes. Cause: The versions were not synchronized, and the cited snippet points to the old document without tracing back to the latest source.
- Phenomenon: The list is missing signatures or receipts, but the statistical totals are still summarized by record count. Cause: The signature column was not included in the verification fields, and exceptions were not listed separately in the definition notes.
How to verify the setup
This feature acceptance: ask a question with original text support, and check whether the citation array and markers can trace back to the original text; then ask a question with no matching materials, and confirm that the array is empty while the chain still runs through.
Business test: use one week of records to verify the totals, and see whether the definitions and exceptions are clearly written.
- Open the search parameter panel and check each item, confirming that the values are consistent with the knowledge base retrieval section; record the citation count by array length, and treat
quoteMaxTokenonly as the citation content budget, without comparing the two for equality. - In the conversation, open the citation markers, compare the original text snippets in
responseData(non-streaming module results returned with detailed output enabled) andquoteListagainst the source document, and check the name, quantity, date, and signature receipt item by item.