What this category's data looks like
In the student awards, grants, loans, and hardship determination scenario, three types of materials—the family economic hardship determination form, the scholarship/grant application form, and the loan receipt—jointly support progress records and statistical verification. The determination form carries household population, income, hardship level, and review signatures, and is the foundational source for hardship status; the application form carries the applied program, amount, academic year, and personal commitment, and is the basis for implementing award and grant programs; the loan receipt carries the disbursement amount, arrival date, and receipt number, and is the evidence for loan arrival reconciliation. The three types of materials are updated by academic year and batch, and fields include name, student ID, class, date, amount, signature, and receipt number. After the materials enter the knowledge base retrieval node, each is cited as a traceable original text passage, used for subsequent comparison of whether the name, quantity, and date of the same record are consistent, and for checking whether signatures and receipts are complete.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the citation output of the knowledge base retrieval node, which outputs an array of cited content, each item containing an original text fragment and a source identifier, and the length can be 0. The progress table and statistical criteria description are then completed by subsequent AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Family economic hardship determination form | Check fields, dates, and signatures: whether household population, income, hardship level, review date, and reviewer signature are complete, and whether the name and class of the same record are consistent with the application form | Open the original determination form in the citation marker and compare fields and signatures item by item; record the number of citations and source identifiers |
| Scholarship/grant application form | Check fields, dates, and signatures: whether the applied program, amount, academic year, personal commitment date, and signature are complete, and whether the amount and number of people match the criteria of the determination form | Open the original application form and compare the name, quantity, and date of the same record; use one week of records to verify the total |
| Loan receipt | Check fields, dates, and signatures: whether the disbursement amount, arrival date, receipt number, and handler signature are complete, and whether the receipt amount is consistent with the application form amount | Open the original receipt and compare the amount and date; confirm whether records missing receipts or signatures have clearly stated exceptions |
| Citation content output | Check the correspondence between the citation array and the original text: each citation can trace back to the original text passage, and the array length can be 0 | Use a question with original text evidence to check the citation markers; use a question with no matching materials to check that the array is empty while the pipeline runs through |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name, class, or amount of the same student does not match between the determination form and the application form. Cause: The two materials were entered in different batches, versions were not synchronized, and they were not aligned by the same record identifier.
- Phenomenon: The loan receipt amount is inconsistent with the application form amount and arrival date. Cause: Receipt updates lag or disbursements arrive in batches, the statistical criteria are not written in the header, and exceptions are not separately marked.
- Phenomenon: Materials are missing review signatures or loan receipts, but the progress table still includes them in the total. Cause: When checking, only the number of records was looked at, signatures and receipts were not checked item by item, and exceptions were not clearly stated in the header.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this feature: ask a question with original text evidence and check whether the citation array and markers can trace back to the original text; then ask a question with no matching materials and confirm that the array is empty while the pipeline runs through. When citation limits are involved, check the tokens of the cited text, record the number of array items separately; quoteMaxToken is the content budget and is not compared for equality with the number of items; you can use responseData (non-streaming module results returned with detailed output enabled) and quoteList together to view cited fragments and source identifiers.
Business test: use one week of records to verify the total, see whether the criteria and exceptions are clearly stated, and whether the number of records matches the statistical count.
- In the node, check whether the selected knowledge base uses the same vector model, and open the search parameter panel to verify the values item by item.
- Run a test with a question that has no matching materials, and see whether the citation array is empty while the output pipeline continues to run through.